CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522JUD000012605
22 mai 2012
Chaskalson CJ further noted that this was a blanket exclusion aimed at every prisoner sentenced to imprisonment without the option of a fine, and that there was no information about the sort of offences
Page 47 sur 123
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC002625807
17 novembre 2009
The Court has always adopted a very fact-specific approach so that blanket bans on demonstrations are not accepted.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD005706700
16 décembre 2003
Blackett, le capitaine de frégate S. Taylor, le général de brigade T. Paphiti, conseillers ; – pour le requérant MM. G.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD006010408
5 décembre 2013
However, on 3 September 2008 the Norwegian Prime Minister told the media that Norway would no longer suspend transfers to Greece under the Dublin Regulation on a blanket basis, but rather that an
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD003958407
15 octobre 2013
cleanliness – presented difficult conditions there being, in some cases, fewer beds than occupants, windows with panes missing and a lack of basic amenities, certain essentials (such as mattresses, sheets, blankets
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD006384909
21 juillet 2016
The Court observes that the applicants were deprived of the right to vote for Parliament as a result of a blanket ban on voting which applied to all convicted persons who were in detention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0920DEC004032498
20 septembre 2001
In his view, the applicant was blamed for his lengthy struggle to secure his right of access. Subsequently, upon query, the applicant filed a further document.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC000843016
12 décembre 2023
time that had elapsed since conviction) would achieve the goals of the restriction at least to the same extent as the regulation in force at that time (it also noted that the law did not provide for a blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0315JUD003941406
15 mars 2011
In particular, he claimed to have been subjected to hanging, to have had his testicles squeezed and to have been forced to lie in ice covered by a wet blanket. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0321DEC004371898
21 mars 2002
Iceland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 28, § 66; and the Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0530JUD003827597
30 mai 2002
expenses were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for instance, Bladet
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124DEC006474614
24 janvier 2017
Court emphasises that, while the press plays an essential role in a democratic society and its duty is to impart information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see, among many authorities, Bladet
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD003210406
10 février 2015
In addition, the Court is mindful of the fact that journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD005638717
22 juin 2021
shown that these were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see Bladet
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202JUD002349705
2 février 2016
Autriche , 8 juillet 1986, § 40, série A n o 103, Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c. Norvège [GC], n o 21980/93, § 62, CEDH 1999-III, et Morice, précité, § 162). 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0203JUD003165502
3 février 2005
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1109DEC005755100
9 novembre 2004
la condition que les intéressés agissent de bonne foi de manière à fournir des informations exactes et dignes de crédit dans le respect de la déontologie journalistique (voir, par exemple les arrêts Bladet
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000340107
17 janvier 2012
goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see Bladet
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD003953407
28 novembre 2013
Denmark , 23 September 1994, § 35, Series A no. 298; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 64, ECHR 1999-III). 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0604JUD002127705
4 juin 2009
Not only does it have the task of imparting such information and ideas: the public also has a right to receive them (see, among many other authorities, Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.