Summary of the facts   Mr Dıkme was arrested on 10 February 1992 and taken into custody by the Anti-terrorist Brigade of the Istanbul Security Services on suspicion of having carried out a number of attacks

Page 8 of the periodical carried a caricature showing two pigs rubbing themselves against the trunk of a tree, with the caption:   “Wolfgang Rauter on the unfair attacks by Rezar, Kaplan and Co: how

The offending articles, published shortly after the 11   September 2001 attacks, had contributed to a political debate of immediate interest, resituating it in the local context.

Degrading treatment Requirement for detainee to wear a balaclava when not in his cell: violation   Facts – After being arrested by the police on suspicion of being the perpetrator of a sulphuric acid attack

Section V] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Conviction of journalist for taking weapon on board aircraft with a view to exposing security flaws: inadmissible Facts – After the terrorist attacks

The attacks had left the first applicant deeply disturbed, afraid and anxious. They complained on numerous occasions to various authorities, including the social services and the ombudsman.

He alleges that for about five hours following his arrest police officers ill-treated him in order to force him to confess to the attack on A.G. and L.B.

In this case, the applicant went through thirty-nine interviews during the week that followed his arrest, and was questioned about his involvement in a recent bomb attack, his membership of the provisional

    Has there been an attack on the applicant’s reputation which attained a sufficient level of seriousness and was made in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect

Moreover, the applicant's statements were not a gratuitous personal attack on a politician.

More specifically:   (a)     Was the applicant’s Facebook post a gratuitous personal attack on, or insult to M.M. (see Mamère v.

[1] The bar where the bombing attack took place. [2] A recording of the relevant press briefing, in Russian, can be found at https://www.youtube.com/watch?

  Summary of the facts   In November 1998 Mr and Mrs Conka and their children left Slovakia for Belgium, where they applied for political asylum on account of repeated attacks allegedly made

The applicant’s complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning a prisoner’s right to protection of his physical integrity from the attacks by third persons and to sufficient redress in the event

The autopsy discarded the assumption made by the police that the death had been caused by an attack by a dog.

.) - 57884/00 Decision 19.5.2005 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for home Burning of houses belonging to Roma villagers and alleged failure of the authorities to prevent the attack: admissible

    On 9 January 2015 an article titled “3,000 Skinheads Go on the Attack Against Refugees and Roma” was published on a website (www.blitz.bg) which was at that time owned by the private company

Mr I.M.’s act amounted to self ‑ defence, because he had used the only means at his disposal to repel the attack.