Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10685
1 septembre 2015
1 septembre 2015
Law – Article 2 of Protocol No.7: The Court reiterated that the Contracting States dispose in principle of a wide margin of appreciation to determine how the right secured by Article 2 of Protocol
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD006973501
6 décembre 2007
6 décembre 2007
The first applicant had not substantiated why it was necessary for his wife and child that he remain in Germany, in particular as his wife financially supported the family and had, already prior to the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC004660199
11 décembre 2001
11 décembre 2001
The evidence of the applicant’s wife, who did not support the applicant’s claims, was crucial in this respect.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113159
29 août 2012
29 août 2012
In November 2007 neighbours told the applicant that police had inquired about his whereabouts, alleging that he had murdered his wife.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607DEC005313499
7 juin 2001
7 juin 2001
He and his wife had two children, one of whom was adopted and born in 1955, the other of whom was born in 1968. On 8 March 1999 his wife died.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3155972-3507812
3 juin 2010
3 juin 2010
Mental suffering resulting from authorities’ reaction after the abduction (Article 3) The applicants were the mother and the wife of Salambek and his wife had witnessed his abduction.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178838
24 octobre 2017
24 octobre 2017
It stated, in particular, that nothing precluded the first applicant from leaving Russia and requesting a Russian visa in Afghanistan on the basis of an official invitation from his wife.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216617
28 février 2022
28 février 2022
The applicant and his wife claimed in addition to have received remuneration as managers of several companies owned by them in Belgium, as well as dividends.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0911DEC003233296
11 septembre 1997
11 septembre 1997
In 1977, the applicant and his wife jointly bought a house, where they took up residence.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160103
7 janvier 2016
7 janvier 2016
The applicant and his wife were also human-rights defenders and operated an NGO named Resource Centre for Democracy and Development of NGOs.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0827JUD007816813
27 août 2019
27 août 2019
In their opinion, there was no evidence that Judge K. being a colleague of the victim’s wife had affected his impartiality.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0619DEC002313004
19 juin 2006
19 juin 2006
In 1997 the applicant and his wife separated and the children remained with the wife.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156685
6 juillet 2015
6 juillet 2015
On an unspecified date in 1996, an investigation was opened against the applicant on suspicion that he had murdered his wife.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0713DEC001279087
13 juillet 1987
13 juillet 1987
The applicant's wife commenced divorce proceedings against him on 12 November 1984 but withdrew them.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1210DEC001549689
10 décembre 1990
10 décembre 1990
On 14 July 1987, the applicant's wife left the applicant and the children to live with another man.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14398
17 octobre 2024
17 octobre 2024
Equally, the respondent State’s margin of appreciation will usually be wide if it is required to strike a balance between competing private and public interests or Convention rights.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0206JUD006101900
6 février 2007
6 février 2007
His wife died on 10 May 1994.
Source officielle1ère chambre sociale
696a6db1cdc6046d478c603e
15 janvier 2026
15 janvier 2026
7] 1ère chambre sociale ORDONNANCE D'EXTINCTION D'INSTANCE N° RG 25/02124 - N° Portalis DBVC-V-B7J-HWEC Madame [J] [V] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représentée par Me Jade DE WITTE
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0228DEC002178493
28 février 1995
28 février 1995
On 9 July 1990 the applicant requested that he be allowed to continue to serve his sentence in the Koridallos prison to be able to visit his wife who was also detained there
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0608DEC003612097
8 juin 1999
8 juin 1999
Particular circumstances of the case The applicant and his wife were married in 1981 and had three children, born in 1984, 1986 and 1990. The applicant’s wife died in 1995.
Source officiellePage 46 sur 606