Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s arguments (paragraphs   11 and 13 above) giving in essence reasons which were similar to those provided by the County Court and which did not specifically address

    Merits (a)     Independence and impartiality of the Judicial Division of the Supreme Court (i)     The dual role of the President of the Supreme Court – The applicant’

    The Court considers that the objections raised by the Government are closely linked to the merits of the applicant’s complaint and should be examined under the provisions of the Convention

deliberations in the merits of the complaints.

No. 1 to the Convention that it should be joined to the merits (see, for a similar approach, Khizanishvili and Kandelaki v.

    With regard to the merits, the proceedings were divided into two parts.

applicant learnt of the administrative proceedings against him only after the case had been set down for trial before the Administrative Court, because the court had sent the relevant notices to the wrong address

He had not asked the domestic courts to make use of their investigative powers; he had merely denied the allegations before the urgent-applications judge, without attempting to establish their inaccuracy

Specifically, the Court must address the question of whether the applicant’s doubts, which stemmed from the specific situation, may be regarded as objectively justified in the circumstances of the case

It did not, however, substantively address any of the points raised by the applicants in their appeal on points of law. The applicants received the Supreme Court’s judgment on 10 March 2008. 2.

    In the present case the investigator’s decision merely referred to a criminal investigation in respect of O.K. and the need to find forged documents and cash.

The fact that they had been registered as residents at the relevant address did not have any effect on their father’s exclusive ownership of the property.

  The Government further submit that events prior to 1 May 1993 should be taken into account merely as a background to the issues before the Commission (Eur. Court HR, Hokkanen v.

(a)     The obligation to establish and apply a legal framework – Russia had not enacted specific legislation to address violence occurring within the family context.

The judgment declaring the divorce was notified to the latter at her new address in May 1991. The judgment of 20 September 1990 was served on her in March 1992.

par ailleurs lieu d'observer qu'ils ont effectué le remboursement des sommes visées dans la citation pour les comptes concernés ; que leur culpabilité retenue pour ces faits dans le jugement déféré mérite

On 25 September 1992 he registered his permanent residence at his friend’s address in Krompachy. He remained registered at this address until 22 June 1994. 9.

  The summons was served at the applicant’s registered address in Lelystad on 28 October 1993.

Elle leur a adressé sa facture le 1er septembre 2021.