CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD007357110
21 octobre 2014
It notes at this juncture that the applicant was at the service of the State-owned television company, albeit under a Labour Code statute.
Page 46 sur 322
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178620
20 octobre 2017
Were the proceedings before the Istanbul 4th Labour Court concluded within a reasonable time, as required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 4.
ECLI:CEDH:001-164413
2 juin 2016
The applicant brought a civil action in the Zagreb Municipal Labour Court ( Općinski radni sud u Zagrebu ).
ECLI:CEDH:001-177856
18 septembre 2017
In particular; (i) Have the applicants been able to receive the pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damages ordered by the Ankara Labour Court on 31 October 2000?
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2019:113
14 février 2019
#Labour Courtin (Irlanti) esittämä ennakkoratkaisupyyntö.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD002612607
8 novembre 2016
Under Article 42 § 3 of the Labour Code that amount was equal to twelve months’ salary.
Cour d'Appel
6253cb1dbd3db21cbdd8cdfc
30 janvier 2009
PORTO-PORTUGAL Après avoir entendu les observations du ministère public en la personne de Monsieur DELPECH, substitut général, du représentant de l'administration en la personne de Monsieur LARROQUE LABORDE
ECLI:CEDH:001-148863
17 novembre 2014
On 26 March 2012 the Celje Labour and Social Court dismissed the applicant’s request.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0604DEC006167315
4 juin 2019
They challenged the decisions before the Budapest Administrative and Labour Court, which again quashed them. 9 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1211JUD005325619
11 décembre 2025
The Labour Court dismissed the case mainly by stating that the applicant was laid off from work because he was believed to be affiliated with a terror organisation or a group that is understood
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD004474604
5 février 2008
On 2 February, 31 August and 26 October 1994 the Labour Court held hearings. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0604DEC004975015
The applicant companies challenged the first ranking and striking-off decisions before the Budapest Administrative and Labour Court which quashed the aforementioned decisions and remitted
2ème chambre
DTA_2309367_20251211
La requête a été communiquée à la commune de Labégude et à M. A... D... qui n’ont pas produit de mémoire en défense.
ECLI:CEDH:001-217510
3 mai 2022
In so deciding it relied on the Associated Labour Act – legislation not relied on or discussed by the parties – to conclude that the State had acquired the land in question by usucapion (adverse possession
ECLI:CEDH:001-220899
19 octobre 2022
Türkiye lodged on 16 July 2021 and 16 July 2021 respectively communicated on 19 October 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the non-execution of decisions delivered by the Silvan Labour
cr
6079a8999ba5988459c4e2ba
23 octobre 1973
SERAIT UN TIERS DE BONNE FOI ET AURAIT PU, S'IL AVAIT ETE AVERTI, DEMANDER A CULTIVER JUSQU'A LA RECOLTE ET RESTERAIT PROPRIETAIRE DE CETTE RECOLTE JUSQU'A REMBOURSEMENT DES LABOURS SEMENCES ET FRAIS;
ION RELATIVE A UNE ORDONNANCE DE TAXE Monsieur Yohan Xc/Maître Olivier Y
6253cd5dbd3db21cbdd9312f
7 avril 2016
.- A..., huissier de Justice, E T : Maître Olivier Y... avocat,... 87000 Limoges Intimé, représenté par Maître DHAEZE-LABOUDIE, avocat au barreau de Limoges Vu les articles 174 et suivants
6253cd61bd3db21cbdd93263
17 mai 2016
COMPARANTE-assistée de Me Corinne DHAEZE-LABOUDIE, avocat au barreau de LIMOGES (bénéficie d'une aide juridictionnelle Totale numéro 2016/ 1239 du 24/ 03/ 2016 accordée par le bureau d'aide juridictionnelle
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330JUD005756600
30 mars 2006
On 5 December 2001 the applicant appealed to the Higher Labour and Social Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC001659310
9 octobre 2012
Furthermore, he complained about the behaviour of one of the inspectors of the Labour Inspectorate during the interview of 13 October 2006. 9.