CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 octobre 2022

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } Published on 7 November 2022   SECOND SECTION Applications nos. 37306/21 and 37307/21 Şirin BİLMEZ and Others against Türkiye and Emel TARTMAK and Others against Türkiye lodged on 16 July 2021 and 16 July 2021 respectively communicated on 19 October 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the non-execution of decisions delivered by the Silvan Labour Court, whereby the applicants were awarded compensation for their receivables arising from labour agreements with the Silvan Municipality. Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention the applicants complain about the continuing non-execution of the final judicial decisions awarding them compensation. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right of access to court, guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, and their right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, on account of the authorities’ failure to execute the final judicial decisions delivered by the Silvan Civil Court (see Tetik and others v.   Turkey, no. 25885/19 and 37 others, 15 March 2022)?   APPENDIX     No. App. No. Case Title First Instance Court`s Decision Compensation Commission Decision First Execution Order Constitutional Court`s Decision 1. 37306/21 Bilmez and O thers v. Turkey 03/05/2011 23/06/2020 24/03/2012 29/11/2108 and 30/03/2021 2. 37307/21 Tartmak and O thers v. Turkey 11/06/2009 12/05/2020 06/01/2010 29/11/2108 and 30/03/2021