Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4635
13 novembre 2003
13 novembre 2003
The court allowed the State Prosecutor’s application and affirmed its judgment following a new trial after the case had been remitted to it by the Court of Cassation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177771
20 septembre 2017
20 septembre 2017
Following his imprisonment, the applicant filed several requests for release on health grounds.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210796
31 mai 2021
31 mai 2021
Following two prolongations of the measure, his detention was terminated on 21 April 2017 as it became evident that his deportation could not be carried out within the time allowed for detention, due to
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC000355808
30 juin 2009
30 juin 2009
THE LAW The Court considers that it is no longer necessary to determine this case for the following reasons.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2469
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
Following the introduction of new legislation in 2005, all the applicants – except for the second, whose medical records had meanwhile been lost – were eventually afforded full access to the requested
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4717
16 septembre 2003
16 septembre 2003
Following examination of the company’s accounts, criminal proceedings were initiated against the applicants.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199346
22 novembre 2019
22 novembre 2019
font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 22 November 2019 SECOND SECTION Application no. 4586/18 Adrian FULLANI against Albania lodged on 12 January 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE Following
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229550
16 novembre 2023
16 novembre 2023
Bulgaria (nos. 66581/12 and 25054/15, 14 May 2020) and concerns allegedly low amount of compensation following the expropriation of land owned by the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231917
7 mars 2024
7 mars 2024
11108/23 Radu Grigoryevich PELIN against Russia PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application on 7 March 2024, the Court decided, under Rule
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1685576-1766614
6 juin 2006
6 juin 2006
HUMAN RIGHTS 327 6.6.2006 Press release issued by the Registrar Chamber judgments concerning France The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230030
12 décembre 2023
12 décembre 2023
During the investigation the police interviewed the applicant in the absence of a lawyer, first as a suspect and then following the bringing of charges against him.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-228919
19 octobre 2023
19 octobre 2023
On 26 April 2021, following a new motion by the medical institution, the applicant was released and receives psychiatric treatment at liberty.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193615
10 mai 2019
10 mai 2019
xa0; FIFTH SECTION Application no. 8827/19 Vladimer MTCHEDLISHVILI against Georgia lodged on 24 January 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment following
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198563
21 octobre 2019
21 octobre 2019
Following a provocative performance aimed at a far right group during the Budapest Pride march in 2014, a far-right wing online portal published the applicant’s name, photos, home address, work place and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310DEC001375706
10 mars 2009
10 mars 2009
Following two remittals, on 19 January 2006 Fifth Municipal Court ( Opštinski sud ) in Belgrade rejected the applicants' claim.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0324DEC003502707
24 mars 2009
24 mars 2009
Following a remittal, this case is currently still pending at first instance. COMPLAINT Under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the excessive length of her civil suit.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1112DEC004025398
12 novembre 2002
12 novembre 2002
They were found liable for mismanagement by the Enterprise Section following an investigator’s report.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC000408408
18 mai 2010
18 mai 2010
THE LAW On 2 April 2010 the Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I, Jakub Wołąsiewicz, Agent of the Polish Government, declare that the Government of Poland offer to pay PLN &
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167174
7 septembre 2016
7 septembre 2016
Following another such complaint, on 16 April 2015 the prison’s doctor recommended that the applicant be examined in a specialised hospital with a view to deciding whether he required a surgery.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003809409
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant, who had been sentenced to eight years of imprisonment on 15 January 2009 by the Koptevskiy District Court of Moscow following his conviction of a large-scale drug trafficking, complained
Source officiellePage 46 sur 2531