Article 217a of the 1952 Code of Civil Procedure, added in July 1999, created a “complaint about delays”.

    The applicant disputed the allegation that he had been responsible for certain delays.

  Proceedings concerning the delay in surrendering possession of a plot of land against the Szczuczyn Agricultural Co-operative (a)   Facts prior to 1 May 1993 On 22 September 1988 the applicant

They conceded that there had been delays of which two years and three and a half months were attributable to the Schwerin District Court.

The delay in determining the dispute as to his rights discloses a violation of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention.

The aggregated delay incurred therefrom amounted to approximately ten months. 28.

There was then an 8 month delay before that was produced (delay not of Mr King’s making). The appeal was launched on 17 August 1992. Judgment was given on 14 January 1994.

further delay the sums awarded by the Court to the applicants, as well as the default interest due.

Zh., in July 2011 a neurologist diagnosed the applicant with “a delay in speech and motor function development”.

in charge of the Central Registrar Office to inquire about the delays. 17.

The State had been responsible only for one year’s delay, but any harm caused by this delay had been made good, because in the end the applicants had received flats of a better quality than awarded.

in consultation by a specialist, lack of/delay in medical examination, lack of/delay in medical testing, absence of the necessary specialists in the detention facility (urologist, an oncology specialist

Popa, a   lawyer practising in Bucharest; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning the overall length of the proceedings, the delay in the preparation

No delays or procedural inactivity could be imputed to the applicant apart from his and his lawyer's absence at the hearing in November 1997. 23.

In this context, the Government also referred to a belated motion to hear evidence submitted by one of the other accused, which caused a considerable delay in proceedings.

  The Public Prosecutor replied on 19 May 1995 that the delay in question was unacceptable.

DUMONT - PAUTHIER [Adresse 1] [Adresse 5] [Localité 2] INTIME Le 6 octobre 2022, Nous, Nathalie DELPEY-CORBAUX, première présidente de la cour d'appel de BESANCON, assistée de Xavier DEVAUX

On 5 August 1992, in view of the continuing delay, Mr.

In this respect the Government noted that the owners would benefit from this delay as they would receive damages for the delay in payment in the form of interest at 5   % per annum from 1974 until