AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC003271396
20 mai 1998
20 mai 1998
The applicant complains that his arrest and detention, aggravated by the failure to provide medical treatment, was contrary to Article 5 para. 1 of the Convention. 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7724
7 septembre 1998
7 septembre 1998
application to Convention institutions, applicant’s main argument had been that if he was deported to what had formerly been Zaïre there would be a considerable risk of his being exposed to treatment contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3147
31 octobre 2006
31 octobre 2006
The travel ban had amounted to an automatic, blanket measure of indefinite duration and had run contrary to the authorities’ duty to take appropriate care that any interference with the right to leave
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4128
23 novembre 2004
23 novembre 2004
not attend the interview because he feared his replies could be used as evidence against him in the trial, and as he had allegedly not obtained satisfactory guarantees from the investigators to the contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167622
19 septembre 2016
19 septembre 2016
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 6 §§ 1, 3 (c) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174518
24 mai 2017
24 mai 2017
OF THE CASE The application concerns the domestic authorities’ refusal to reduce the applicant’s sentence of imprisonment on the basis, inter alia , of a new case-law adopted by the Supreme Court contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189696
10 janvier 2019
10 janvier 2019
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194107
29 mai 2019
29 mai 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life due to the length of the custody and visiting rights proceedings in relation to L and T, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204111
1 juillet 2020
1 juillet 2020
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the present case?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203027
18 mai 2020
18 mai 2020
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, given the applicant’s allegations
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200282
12 décembre 2019
12 décembre 2019
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights on account of her sexual orientation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197192
3 octobre 2019
3 octobre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198337
8 octobre 2019
8 octobre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178827
26 octobre 2017
26 octobre 2017
Has the applicant suffered discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-150896
7 janvier 2015
7 janvier 2015
Were the restrictions imposed on the applicant on 30 December 2014, purportedly pursuant to Article 5 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211635
15 juillet 2021
15 juillet 2021
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224012
8 mars 2023
8 mars 2023
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention in so far as the enforcement of the Family Court of Nicosia
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4697
23 septembre 2003
23 septembre 2003
The applicant asserts that if he is deported, besides the risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3, there would be an interference with his private and family life, as he has a common-law
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216651
2 mars 2022
2 mars 2022
applicant complains under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that there was no reasonable suspicion that he had committed the offence imputed to him and that the length of his pre-trial detention was contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194254
28 juillet 2016
28 juillet 2016
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officiellePage 46 sur 1005