CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC003271396

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1998

20 mai 1998

   The applicant complains that his arrest and detention, aggravated by the failure to provide medical treatment, was contrary to Article 5 para. 1 of the Convention.   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7724

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1998

7 septembre 1998

application to Convention institutions, applicant’s main argument had been that if he was deported to what had formerly been Zaïre there would be a considerable risk of his being exposed to treatment contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3147

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2006

31 octobre 2006

The travel ban had amounted to an automatic, blanket measure of indefinite duration and had run contrary to the authorities’ duty to take appropriate care that any interference with the right to leave

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4128

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2004

23 novembre 2004

not attend the interview because he feared his replies could be used as evidence against him in the trial, and as he had allegedly not obtained satisfactory guarantees from the investigators to the contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167622

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2016

19 septembre 2016

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 6 §§ 1, 3 (c) of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174518

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2017

24 mai 2017

OF THE CASE The application concerns the domestic authorities’ refusal to reduce the applicant’s sentence of imprisonment on the basis, inter alia , of a new case-law adopted by the Supreme Court contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189696

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2019

10 janvier 2019

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194107

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2019

29 mai 2019

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life due to the length of the custody and visiting rights proceedings in relation to L and T, contrary to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204111

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2020

1 juillet 2020

    QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the present case?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203027

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2020

18 mai 2020

    QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention, given the applicant’s allegations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-200282

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2019

12 décembre 2019

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights on account of her sexual orientation, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-197192

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2019

3 octobre 2019

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198337

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2019

8 octobre 2019

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178827

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2017

26 octobre 2017

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-150896

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2015

7 janvier 2015

  Were the restrictions imposed on the applicant on 30 December 2014, purportedly pursuant to Article 5 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211635

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2021

15 juillet 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224012

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2023

8 mars 2023

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention in so far as the enforcement of the Family Court of Nicosia

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4697

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2003

23 septembre 2003

The applicant asserts that if he is deported, besides the risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3, there would be an interference with his private and family life, as he has a common-law

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216651

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2022

2 mars 2022

applicant complains under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention that there was no reasonable suspicion that he had committed the offence imputed to him and that the length of his pre-trial detention was contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194254

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 2016

28 juillet 2016

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle

Page 46 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →