CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

16 978 résultats pour « Callede »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51604

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 1996

15 novembre 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 31 July 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51165

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 14 March 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51391

Admin. suprême

25 juin 1996

25 juin 1996

with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51270

Admin. suprême

9 février 1996

9 février 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49258

Admin. suprême

11 avril 1985

11 avril 1985

      Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, that no further action is called for in this case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51384

Admin. suprême

25 juin 1996

25 juin 1996

with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 23 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51390

Admin. suprême

25 juin 1996

25 juin 1996

with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9380

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2014

1 avril 2014

General measures at the national level were undoubtedly called for including, in particular, a domestic remedy as regards undue length of proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199398

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2019

19 novembre 2019

They referred to concerns about how the domestic courts carried out the review of lawfulness, notably the so ‑ called “ ultima-ratio ” review of secret surveillance activities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187353

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2018

4 octobre 2018

While the lawfulness of the possession of the gold was not called into question, the court fined the applicant UAH 340 (about EUR 30   at the time) and ordered confiscation of all the jewelleries

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1487

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2009

23 juin 2009

In the article, the first applicant called a well-known male lawyer “a blonde” and the second applicant published a photograph of a blonde woman in her underwear next to an anagram of the lawyer’s name

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142945

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2014

8 avril 2014

On a part of the occupied territories the so called “Serbian Independent Region Krajina” (hereinafter “the Krajina”) was formed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6079

Admin. suprême

8 février 2000

8 février 2000

As a result, the proceedings had taken place without a hearing at first instance and on appeal before the judicial officer called upon to take a decision on the merits.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9640

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 1993

26 janvier 1993

s intention to abscond and could legitimately suffice to demonstrate that such a danger still existed - nothing called for different conclusion by Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49289

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 1989

10 novembre 1989

paragraph 3.e (art. 6-3-e), of the Convention in this case;   Takes note of the information provided by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany;   Decides that no further action is called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51259

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 14 March 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-51280

Admin. suprême

9 février 1996

9 février 1996

accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4338

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2004

1 juin 2004

In August 1995 he was called up for military service.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162151

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2016

21 mars 2016

content of the custody file which, despite his request was not fully disclosed to the applicant, and that the domestic courts did not state in their decisions why none of the witnesses and experts called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49296

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1990

23 octobre 1990

. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of Sweden pay to the applicant the sum of 10 000 Swedish crowns in respect of non-pecuniary damage;   Decides, therefore, that no further action is called

Source officielle

Page 46 sur 849

← PrécédentSuivant →