AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51604
15 novembre 1996
15 novembre 1996
accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 31 July 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is now called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51165
15 mai 1996
15 mai 1996
accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 14 March 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51391
25 juin 1996
25 juin 1996
with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51270
9 février 1996
9 février 1996
accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49258
11 avril 1985
11 avril 1985
Decides, having regard to the information supplied by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany, that no further action is called for in this case.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51384
25 juin 1996
25 juin 1996
with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 23 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51390
25 juin 1996
25 juin 1996
with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but that the screening panel of the Court decided on 24 April 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court; whereas the Committee of Ministers is therefore now called
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9380
1 avril 2014
1 avril 2014
General measures at the national level were undoubtedly called for including, in particular, a domestic remedy as regards undue length of proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199398
19 novembre 2019
19 novembre 2019
They referred to concerns about how the domestic courts carried out the review of lawfulness, notably the so ‑ called “ ultima-ratio ” review of secret surveillance activities.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187353
4 octobre 2018
4 octobre 2018
While the lawfulness of the possession of the gold was not called into question, the court fined the applicant UAH 340 (about EUR 30 at the time) and ordered confiscation of all the jewelleries
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1487
23 juin 2009
23 juin 2009
In the article, the first applicant called a well-known male lawyer “a blonde” and the second applicant published a photograph of a blonde woman in her underwear next to an anagram of the lawyer’s name
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142945
8 avril 2014
8 avril 2014
On a part of the occupied territories the so called “Serbian Independent Region Krajina” (hereinafter “the Krajina”) was formed.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6079
8 février 2000
8 février 2000
As a result, the proceedings had taken place without a hearing at first instance and on appeal before the judicial officer called upon to take a decision on the merits.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9640
26 janvier 1993
26 janvier 1993
s intention to abscond and could legitimately suffice to demonstrate that such a danger still existed - nothing called for different conclusion by Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49289
10 novembre 1989
10 novembre 1989
paragraph 3.e (art. 6-3-e), of the Convention in this case; Takes note of the information provided by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany; Decides that no further action is called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51259
15 mai 1996
15 mai 1996
accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 14 March 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-51280
9 février 1996
9 février 1996
accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 12 December 1995 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4338
1 juin 2004
1 juin 2004
In August 1995 he was called up for military service.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162151
21 mars 2016
21 mars 2016
content of the custody file which, despite his request was not fully disclosed to the applicant, and that the domestic courts did not state in their decisions why none of the witnesses and experts called
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49296
23 octobre 1990
23 octobre 1990
. 32) of the Convention, that the Government of Sweden pay to the applicant the sum of 10 000 Swedish crowns in respect of non-pecuniary damage; Decides, therefore, that no further action is called
Source officiellePage 46 sur 849