CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG — 15 mai 1996

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block }    The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),     Having regard to the report drawn up on 27 June 1995 by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 28 January 1992 by Mr J. D. against the Netherlands (Application No. 19508/92);     Whereas on 1 September 1995 the Commission transmitted the said report to the Committee of Ministers and whereas the period of three months provided for in Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed and the case has not been referred to the European Court of Human Rights, neither by the Commission nor by a state entitled to do so under Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention, within the time-limit of three months from the transmission of the reports to the Chairman of the Committee of Ministers; however, whereas within this time-limit, the applicant seized the Court in accordance with Protocol No. 9 (P9) but considering that the screening panel of the Court decided on 14 March 1996 that this case would not be considered by the Court, the Committee of Ministers is now called upon to take a decision in accordance with Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention and with Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention as amended by Article 5 of Protocol No. 9 (P9-5) for those states having ratified the latter;     Whereas in his application, declared admissible by the Commission on 5 July 1995, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;     Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention;     Whereas, at the 564th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies held on 30 April 1996, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the opinion expressed by the Commission, held, having voted in accordance with the provisions of Article 32, paragraph 1 (art. 32-1), of the Convention, that there had been in this case a violation of Article 6, paragraph 1 (art. 6-1), of the Convention,     Authorises the publication of the report adopted by the Commission in this case;     Decides to pursue the examination of the present case in accordance with Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention with a view to adopting the final resolution.