The Court went on to observe that, in the Government’s submission, the applicant had not been the subject of the impugned measure, but had been involved “fortuitously” in a telephone conversation recorded

respectait pas les distances imposées par le règlement sanitaire entre ces deux bâtiments, expliquant cependant que le voisin, lui, "avait des vaches et n'avait même pas de fosses à purin" et que sa bergerie

One had been terminated. Of the babies born from the other four, three had been ritually murdered and one had been sold. 8.

He complained, inter alia , that the proceedings were defective in that the Public Prosecutor's appeal had not been served on him.

It reasoned that, whereas the former order of 16 May 2002 to join the proceedings had been unconstitutional because the second set of proceedings had been a considerably more complex case with numerous

of one year and that this reduction has been caused by an illness, a defect or an injury.

Berro-Lefevre, judges, and Mr V. Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 16 November 2006, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

had rightly concluded, once the objects had been discovered, that the demonstration had lost its peaceful nature.

The applicant complained under Articles 1, 4 § 2, 6 § 1, 13 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 that the judgment given in her favour had not been enforced in full.

been necessary.

On 1 April 2005 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had in fact been released from prison on 19 October 2004, but that the aforementioned letters had nonetheless been forwarded from the

(b)     the matter has been resolved; or ...

However, no response has been received. On 21 August copy of the letter of 20   August 2008 had been sent to the applicant by registered post.

It had been established that the chimney’s height had been reduced by fifteen metres, to thirty metres.

Indeed ... nothing material has been withheld .”

It had been established that the chimney’s height had been reduced by fifteen metres, to thirty metres.

Les policiers menacèrent Edip Berk de défoncer la porte de l'appartement de son père, Misbah Berk, qui ne voulait pas ouvrir et de le mitrailler.

Under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 the applicants also complained that their property rights had been violated in that subsidies for the year 1999 had not been paid to them on a monthly basis.

Their opinion had not been properly recorded or had been ignored by the Social Welfare Board.