On 28 August 2012 the Babushkinskyy District Court quashed that decision.

On 18 August 2009 the Ministry returned the registration documents again finding other deficiencies in the documents submitted to it.

On 4 August 2000 and on 10 August 2000 the applicant’s representative and the Agent of the Government respectively submitted formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case.

In August 2007 the applicant complained to the Budapest XIIth District Guardianship Authority that his access granted in respect of August 2007 could not be exercised on the account of the mother’s reluctance

On 11 January 2007 the court decided not to annul the decision of 22   August 2006.

None of the doctors had been involved in assessing the applicant’s state of health on 9   August   2012. 6.

    From August 1999 until August 2006 the applicant was detained in the Simferopol SIZO. 1.     The applicant’s account of the conditions of his detention 34.

    At about 9 a.m. on 6 August 2002 the applicant was brought before a judge of the Staropoltavskiy District Court, who found that at 6   p.m. on 5   August 2002 the applicant had

    On 23 August 2005 a representative of the military commander’s office asked the Military Court of the Rostov-on-Don Garrison to quash the judgment of 25 August 2003 on account of newly discovered

Incident of 20 August 2001 The applicant alleged that, on 20 August 2001, he had been severely beaten in Zagreb Prison by Ž.P., a prison guard.

On 4 August 2003 the Town Court sent a notification about the examination of the appeal by the Regional Court on 14 August 2003 to the detention facility in which the applicant was detained and to his

She started another employment on 24 August 2007, which she continued until 31 August 2011. (b)     Revocation of the “EWK” pension 10.

The applicant’s complaint was dismissed on 19 August 2010. On 9 November 2011 the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the judgment of 19 August 2010.   2.

On 1 August 2013 this decision was quashed on the grounds, inter alia , that the applicant’s statements of unlawful and unrecorded detention in August 2012 and allegations of threats made in the IZ on

    The applicant complained that the search and seizure warrant of 23 August 1989 violated his rights under Article 8 of the Convention.

On 16 July and on 5 August 1997 the parties submitted further documents at the District Court’s request. The next hearing was held on 3 June 1998.

    On 4 August 2017 the applicant appealed.

By a judgment of 20 October 2003 the applicant’s monthly allowance was adjusted in accordance with the judgment of 7 August 2002.

On 19 August 2009 the Court received a letter dated 11 August 2009, consisting of a one-page long document from the applicant’s lawyer wherein he had informed the Court that the applicant had been apprised