İzzet Matyar, a Turkish national, alleges that, in July 1993, his house and property were damaged and crops burned, following an armed attack on his village, Basoğ, in the province of Şirnak in South-East

According to the newspaper all the above facts and the lack of action on the part of the police officers who arrived at the scene of the events raised a reasonable suspicion that the attack on the newspaper

The fact that the applicant had published a list of specific possible targets, in itself, had neither increased nor decreased the chances of a hypothetical Iranian attack.

Based on an EEG, ECHO and a blood analysis, the doctors diagnosed the child with iron-deficiency anaemia and held that the attacks were blue breath holding spells (“katılma nöbetleri”), not associated

In the course of the investigation immediately afterwards, evidence was taken from witnesses and samples collected at the scene of the attack.

The applicant Government submitted that, in the course of indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks by Russian forces and/or by the separatist forces under their control, hundreds of civilians were injured

of the Police ( Polis Vazife ve Selahiyet Kanunu ) provides:   “In cases of resistance by persons whose arrest is necessary or by groups whose dispersal is necessary or of their threatening to attack

The Jordanian applicant also had a prior conviction in Jordan for involvement in terrorist attacks and was alleged to be the spiritual advisor to certain people associated with Al Qa’eda.

During the rally they were attacked by a group of Conservative Orthodox Christian activists who had previously announced their intended attack on their website.

  Decision of the Court   Article 2   The Court considered that, in the applicant’s case, further violence, indeed a lethal attack, had not only been possible but even foreseeable, given

In his observations to the Court, the applicant alleged that he had left the Achille Lauro before the attack by the commando and had stayed in Egypt.

They pressured him to confess to planning and performing terrorist attacks, but he did not. After that they took him to his home where a search was performed.

The Commission is also not persuaded that the applicant was as a result prohibited from commenting on what was to his view a racist attack.

monitoring of telecommunications, that is, collecting information by intercepting telecommunications in order to identify and avert serious dangers facing the Federal Republic of Germany, such as an armed attack

A pre-trial investigation into the attack was opened the same day by the Pravieniškės Prison authorities. On 10 July 2003 the applicant was acknowledged as a victim by the investigators.

reliable and detailed reports by international bodies that unambiguously attested to daily ceasefire violations, country-wide hostilities, the devastating impact that armed conflict and indiscriminate attacks

October 1995, the German Federal Public Prosecutor General ( Generalbundesanwalt ) instituted a criminal investigation against Mr Uzun and a presumed accomplice on charges of having participated in bomb attacks

remedy effective in principle for rectifying demeaning detention conditions following industrial action in prison: partly inadmissible Facts – From 5 to 20   March 2019, in response to a knife attack

The Turkish Government claimed that an armed attack was carried out on Konaklı gendarme station on 2   April 1992 by members of the PKK.