Final administrative decisions may be revised where the European Court of Human Rights has found a violation of the Convention that persists and can only cease via revision (Article  

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ksenija Turković, President,   Krzysztof Wojtyczek,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,  

Italie, La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme (première section), siégeant en une chambre composée de   :   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, président,   Guido Raimondi,   Ledi Bianku

    Furthermore, without the requested Contracting Party’s consent the person cannot be transferred to a third state ...” Article 69.

No war crime...can go unpunished and no perpetrator of a war crime can go unpunished...

sitting on 6 March 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Their belated appearance at the hearing cannot be said to constitute an attempt to flee from justice, which would have called for the imposition of a custodial measure.” 16.

The Court reiterates that an applicant cannot be required to cooperate actively with the judicial authorities, nor can he or she be criticised for having made full use of the remedies available under the

Finally, before charges can be withdrawn the C.O. must consent.   3.

It does not lend to the acts of torture themselves any official or governmental character or nature, or mean that it can in any way be regarded as an official function to inflict, or that an official can

, Alexandra, 1/8 ab indivisio.

    The applicants were represented by Mr Alexander Baramidze, Mr   Irakli Kandashvili and Mr   Hans von   Sachsen-Altenburg, lawyers practising in Tbilisi.

Article 35 §   1 cannot be interpreted in a manner which would require an applicant to inform the Court of his complaint before final settlement of his position on the matter at the domestic level

    The Court cannot accept the Government’s argument that the determination of the aggregate sentence was a mere “formality” and an “arithmetical” exercise (see, by contrast, Nurmagomedov ,

The court can replace the detention with bail also upon the motion of the defence. 33.

  30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII), there can be little doubt that the length of the administrative proceedings could be viewed as excessive.

The Court cannot, however, view such documents as sufficiently reliable (see, among other authorities, Novinskiy v. Russia , no.   11982/02, §   105, 10   February 2009). 36.

    The Court cannot discern any reason in the present case to depart from the position taken by the aforementioned Russian courts.

Having regard to the above, the Court concludes that the delay in the present case cannot be considered compatible with the requirement of “ speediness” laid down in Article 5 § 4. 63.