CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 262 résultats pour « Volfinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103DEC006181513

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

They had no right to vote but were considered as non ‑ voting ad   hoc expert members of the court.

Page 45 sur 64

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC1 résultat

Journal officiel
Radiations

LE QUINZE, VOLFINGER, Arnaud

SIREN 480271832GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE BOBIGNY

13/10/2008

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD006754413

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2018

24 avril 2018

and rural areas where a citizen did not have land, except for the cities of Vilnius, Kaunas, Klaipėda, Šiauliai, Panevėžys, Alytus, Marijampolė, Druskininkai, Palanga, Birštonas and Neringa; legally voiding

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0705JUD000234502

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2005

5 juillet 2005

expected to submit in the way of substantiation of his account and as a possible explanation for the four-month gap – used as an argument against him by the respondent Government – between his allegedly voicing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623JUD003445607

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2015

23 juin 2015

It is also true that the voicing of suspicions regarding an accused’s innocence is conceivable as long as the conclusion of criminal proceedings has not resulted in a decision on the merits of the accusation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0221JUD000708811

Admin. suprême

21 février 2019

21 février 2019

The applicants had lacked diligence in voicing their grievances before the relevant domestic authorities in a timely fashion.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1128JUD002520906

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2013

28 novembre 2013

Moreover, he waited for six months before voicing his complaint at domestic level, although for more than five months of that period he was legally represented (see paragraphs   47, 56 and 66 above

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0913DEC002752104

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2007

13 septembre 2007

Belgium of 13   January 2005 and Leutscher v. the Netherlands of 26 March 1996, the Government considered that the voicing of suspicions regarding an accused’s innocence was conceivable as long as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD007803901

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2010

2 mars 2010

This applies in particular to the election results: individual citizens may challenge them on the grounds of irregularities in the voting procedures.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510DEC003946809

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2016

10 mai 2016

criminal acts as stated in their article in the Himara newspaper, whose publisher is Angjello   Kokaveshi, are the principal organisers of the criminal acts that took place in Himara during the voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD004349409

Admin. suprême

23 février 2016

23 février 2016

    The Lower House of Parliament adopted the Act by 132 votes to 12 of the members present and voting. 31.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0111JUD006628901

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2005

11 janvier 2005

representatives of the local population during the negotiation of the Nouméa Accord that the ballots should reflect the will of the population “concerned” and that their results should not be affected by mass voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;ARTICLE47;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3004688-3312583

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2010

22 janvier 2010

The letter added that “significant procedural violations [had been] committed”, that “the transparent voting procedure for the candidates [had] not been ensured” and that the Council of Judges of Ukraine

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0305DEC001035118

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2024

5 mars 2024

Are you aware of what you are doing with your voting and conduct in relation to our proposal to hear the Prime Minister?!

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0106JUD000048924

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2026

6 janvier 2026

Article 12 – Quorum and voting “Decisions of the Arbitration Committee shall be taken by an absolute majority of the members present at the meeting.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412JUD001297607

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

The applicant conceded that the minutes of the Arkhangelsk and Yaroslavl regional conferences contained typing errors, which, however, did not affect the outcome of the voting.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD002727615

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2023

12 janvier 2023

amended, among other things, Article   149 of the Constitution to provide, in particular, that a Constitutional Court judge could not have a measure of legal liability imposed on him or her for voting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0722JUD001565322

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2025

22 juillet 2025

In terms of the direct threat to elections, we have been informed that the mechanics of the UK’s voting system are deemed largely sound: the use of a highly dispersed paper-based voting and counting system

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD002415922

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

The following were all found to have deviated from the applicable legislation: the procedures for verifying consistency between the ballots cast and the voting results; and the fact that ballots had not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD001350520

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2025

16 décembre 2025

After the campaign, the network continued to organise protests and, from late 2018, promoted a tactical-voting project known as “Smart Voting”, designed to consolidate the opposition vote against the ruling

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0113JUD004291498

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2005

13 janvier 2005

It is true that the voicing of suspicions regarding an accused's innocence is conceivable as long as the conclusion of criminal proceedings has not resulted in a decision on the merits of the accusation

Source officielle