The operation of 14 March 2014 (a)     Planning and preparation 12.

Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicants’ memorial on 23 March 1999 and the Government’s memorial on 25 March 1999. 7.

2020) and three orders were made for his release on bail (11 October 2019, 18 February 2020 and 20   March 2020). 10 .

The march down Yakimanka Street and Bolshaya Polyanka Street went peacefully without any disruption.

    In March 2009 his tuberculosis disease progressed again. As a result, on 13   March 2009 he was referred again to the prison’s medical unit for inpatient treatment. 71.

The court did not see any reason to believe that the applicant company had not received the summons since the stub from the summons proved that it had been sent out and since “there was no evidence that

On 9 March 2007 an investigator of the Kirov Regional prosecutor’s office again found no evidence of a criminal conduct.

Ukraine , no. 26230/11, § 52, 3 March 2016). II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 65.

  15212/03, 1   March 2005).

Her studies and professional qualifications open up a wider range of opportunities for her on the employment market (see paragraph 4 above).

    On 6 March 2014 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

On 14 March 1967, the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) dismissed the Applicant's constitutional appeal (Verfassungsbeschwerde) from the Court of Appeal's decision of 12 August 1966

In its reasoning, the Court of Appeal noted the applicant’s final conviction by the Ahrensburg District Court on 18 March 1993.

  After being released in March   1996, he gained employment as a manager in the welding department of a company.

United Kingdom , judgment of 2   March 1987, Series   A no.

The tapes were ruled admissible on 13 March 2000.

It appears that the request was sent to the Austrian court on 23 March 2006 and received by the District Court for Civil Matters on 29 March 2006.

    On 7 March 2014 the applicant appealed against this decision.

    On 13 March 2012 the parties were heard by the domestic court. 24.