CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0629JUD002739606
29 juin 2012
The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Page 45 sur 2215
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520REP002649495
20 mai 1998
1983 as amended ("the MHRT Rules").
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC003747197
18 septembre 2001
Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic legislation is the Prison and Young Offenders Centre Rules (Northern Ireland) 1995 (“the Rules”), which came into effect on 1 March 1995.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0616JUD001402588
16 juin 1999
Botoucharova (Rule 24 § 3 and Rule 100 § 4).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC002176214
20 janvier 2015
39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of the Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the parties,
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0723JUD004050317
23 juillet 2020
39 of the Rules of Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0209JUD006554609
9 février 2017
Done in English, and notified in writing on 9 February 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109JUD003465897
9 janvier 2003
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0115JUD003249996
15 janvier 2002
The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC000595807
15 décembre 2009
Rule 62 § 1 of the Rules of Court reiterates this principle and Rule 62 § 2 thereof stipulates that no written or oral communication and no offer or concession made within the friendly settlement framework
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD007680901
9 juin 2005
On 1 February 2005 the Court decided to deal with the Government's request under the procedure of revision of a judgment under Rule 80 of the Rules of Court and to give the applicant three
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:1121JUD000760476
21 novembre 1983
Evrigenis and Sir Vincent Evans, who were prevented from taking part in the further consideration of the case (Rules 22 § 1 and 24 § 1 of the Rules of Court). 11.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139699
27 novembre 2013
The costs rule can be similarly justified.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0524JUD001167185
24 mai 1991
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he did not wish to take part in the proceedings. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0902DEC005799010
2 septembre 2014
as enshrined in Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0330DEC000445170
30 mars 1971
by Rule 52 of the Prison Rules.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2751
26 avril 2007
The applicant lodged an application with the European Court of Human Rights, which on 15 July 2005 indicated to the French Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court (interim measures) that it was
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD002991096
17 mars 2005
(Rule 28 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0411REP001023983
11 avril 1989
This Report, which is drawn up by the Commission in accordance with Rule 54 of its Rules of Procedure, concerns the application brought by Peter Wardlaw against the United
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0303DEC001167485
3 mars 1986
Further any rules regarding clothing only affect the children during their attendance at school and they remain at liberty to express themselves as they wish outside.