CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

44 289 résultats pour « Rula »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0629JUD002739606

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2012

29 juin 2012

    The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

Page 45 sur 2215

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520REP002649495

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1998

20 mai 1998

1983 as amended ("the MHRT Rules").

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC003747197

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2001

18 septembre 2001

  Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic legislation is the Prison and Young Offenders Centre Rules (Northern Ireland) 1995 (“the Rules”), which came into effect on 1 March 1995.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0616JUD001402588

Admin. suprême

16 juin 1999

16 juin 1999

Botoucharova (Rule   24   §   3 and Rule 100 § 4).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0120DEC002176214

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2015

20 janvier 2015

39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of the Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the parties,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0723JUD004050317

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2020

23 juillet 2020

39 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0209JUD006554609

Admin. suprême

9 février 2017

9 février 2017

Done in English, and notified in writing on 9 February 2017, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0109JUD003465897

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2003

9 janvier 2003

    The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0115JUD003249996

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2002

15 janvier 2002

    The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule   52 §   1 of the Rules of Court).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC000595807

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2009

15 décembre 2009

Rule 62 § 1 of the Rules of Court reiterates this principle and Rule 62 § 2 thereof stipulates that no written or oral communication and no offer or concession made within the friendly settlement framework

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0609JUD007680901

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2005

9 juin 2005

    On 1 February 2005 the Court decided to deal with the Government's request under the procedure of revision of a judgment under Rule 80 of the Rules of Court and to give the applicant three

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:1121JUD000760476

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 1983

21 novembre 1983

Evrigenis and Sir Vincent Evans, who were prevented from taking part in the further consideration of the case (Rules 22 § 1 and 24 § 1 of the Rules of Court). 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-139699

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2013

27 novembre 2013

The costs rule can be similarly justified.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0524JUD001167185

Admin. suprême

24 mai 1991

24 mai 1991

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he did not wish to take part in the proceedings.   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0902DEC005799010

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2014

2 septembre 2014

as enshrined in Rule 62 § 2 of the Rules of Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0330DEC000445170

Admin. suprême

30 mars 1971

30 mars 1971

by Rule 52 of the Prison Rules.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2751

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2007

26 avril 2007

The applicant lodged an application with the European Court of Human Rights, which on 15 July 2005 indicated to the French Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court (interim measures) that it was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD002991096

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2005

17 mars 2005

(Rule 28 of the Rules of Court).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0411REP001023983

Admin. suprême

11 avril 1989

11 avril 1989

      This Report, which is drawn up by the Commission in accordance with Rule 54 of its Rules of Procedure, concerns the application brought by Peter Wardlaw against the United

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0303DEC001167485

Admin. suprême

3 mars 1986

3 mars 1986

Further any rules regarding clothing only affect the children during their attendance at school and they remain at liberty to express themselves as they wish outside.

Source officielle