and the armed man put the gun away.

It may be subject to editorial revision.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mortensen v.

Federation’, no paramilitary formations may be established in the Russian Federation.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Fatullayev v.

France , no. 50342/99, §   39, 27 May 2003).

It further accepted that the Regulations constituted a sufficient legal basis in such matters.

  Kashcheyev on 13 May 2003 and became enforceable on 26 May 2003, was enforced on 15 September 2005.

Thus, it considers that these matters fall to be examined below under the substantive provision of the Convention. III.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Amanat Ilyasova and Others v.

Jebens, judges , and   Mr   S.

  13628/03, 16 May 2006). 20.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Khatuyeva v.

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Lesjak v.

On 24 March 2001 and 18 January 2002 the investigators questioned one of the Magomedov brothers, who had also been detained on 27 May 2000.

    On 22 May 2003 the investigators requested information on vehicles used by the ROVD between 10 November 2002 and 25 May 2003 from the head of the ROVD.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Shkalla v.

The degree of public scrutiny required may well vary from case to case.

    The judgment of 1 May 1996 sentencing the applicant to safe custody 6.