Following difficulties encountered by the applicant’s wife in obtaining such rectification, the Consulate again refused to issue the visas.

Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 29 April 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

  The following members of the Commission were present when the Report was adopted:                 MM. C. A.

At the same time, it is not possible in the present case to reclassify the defendant’s actions for the following reasons ...

    In respect of the applicant Erol Maks Kohen, the trial court made the following observations.

She faced eleven charges altogether: one count of forging financial documents, false attestations and forging signatures, two counts of issuing forged invoices and six counts of producing a forged invoice

The applicants appealed to the County Administrative Court which, on 11 April 2005, following an oral hearing, upheld the Council’s decision.

Following this decision, the accused entered a plea of “not guilty”. The case was referred back to the District Court and the hearing was listed for 11 March 1994.

  Following his successful appeal, the arrest warrant was set aside and he was released on 19 October 1990.

  The applicant was arrested on suspicion of forging bank notes and placed in pre-trial detention in Chalkida Prison in March 1998. He was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment in 2003.

declare the remainder of the application inadmissible; the decision not to disclose the applicant’s name; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated in private on 24 October 2024, Delivers the following

    On 14 July 1999 criminal proceedings were instituted against the second applicant for forging documents and tax evasion. The second applicant gave an undertaking not to abscond. 8.

The applicant’s lawyer immediately applied for his client’s release, pleading his extreme old age (87 years) and his poor state of health following a triple heart bypass operation in 1996.

For this purpose, various opinions and statements were obtained, including the following. 18.

In its report the Commission gave the following account of the statements they made: "23.

        The applicants are/were all Danish nationals and are in the following referred to under A to G/G1, and K to L.

Following the birth of her son J, in 1986, the first applicant and her sons returned to her parents before she moved to Högsbohöjd in the summer of 1986.

At the court’s following meeting the lay assessors announced their withdrawal on the above grounds.

    During a hearing before the Court of Serious Crimes, Z.Y. denied the charges, in particular that of forming an organised group.