The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. THE LAW I.     JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS 6.

    The applicant complained about her confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against her.

During the hearing before the HSCU the applicant was placed in a glass cabin where he remained handcuffed throughout.

and 3   month(s) and 16   day(s) Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law to complain about poor conditions of transport,   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during

During his examination, the applicant complained that he had been ill-treated under custody.

The applicant was not assisted by a lawyer during that interview. At 8.30 a.m., the applicant, her boyfriend and D.L. were formally arrested on charges of sexual assault and murder.

    The applicant complained about his confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against him.

During his arrest the applicant was hit by the policemen in his chest and placed in a police car with the use of coercion techniques. 5.

  The parties disagreed as to what had happened during the prison riot.

At around 11 p.m. a police patrol arrived, reminded them to keep quiet during night hours, checked their documents and ordered them to disperse.

During the first two months of hearings, the applicant and nine other accused were confined in a very cramped glass cabin.

During his last visit, the doctors noted that his health had deteriorated. During the same period he received physiotherapy in the hospital prison.

  During subsequent interrogations between January and August 1999 the applicant refused legal assistance; he was advised by a legal aid lawyer on a few occasions after that.

During this time, the police established a police presence ( gecici karakol ) at the applicant’s house and remained there until 7 p.m.

Furthermore, the applicant did not have legal assistance at the stage of the investigation, during which the main evidence was obtained.

    The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that he was ill-treated during the search of 28 October 2006. 19.

During that period there were several incidents where the police used allegedly excessive force against demonstrators.

The applicants’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention during transport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).

The Court stressed that a woman’s pregnancy as such could not be considered fraudulent behaviour, and that the financial obligations imposed on the State during a woman’s pregnancy by themselves could