CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109471
3 janvier 2012
They finally complain that by failing to take any resolute action against I.M. the authorities allow the destruction of their Convention rights, contrary to Article 17 of the Convention.
Page 45 sur 1005
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10637
4 juin 2015
The Court saw no indication that the applicant’s detention pending the entry into force of the judgment of 12 July 2010 was contrary to the domestic law.
ECLI:CEDH:001-159741
10 décembre 2015
With respect to the alcohol test and psychiatric examination of 8 February 2013, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life, contrary to Article 8
ECLI:CEDH:001-126411
30 août 2013
Has there been a breach of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention on account of the sanctions imposed on him on 26 January 2006?
ECLI:CEDH:001-127149
19 septembre 2013
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, and his right to freedom of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0205DEC003667311
5 février 2019
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that, contrary to the three ‑ year time-limit, domestic courts ordered
ECLI:CEDH:001-187794
23 octobre 2018
the circumstances, has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life that encompasses a right to the mutual enjoyment by parent and child of each other’s company, contrary
ECLI:CEDH:001-179000
2 novembre 2017
Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, taken in conjunction with Article 8?
ECLI:CEDH:002-3470
14 février 2006
It had therefore been crucial for the applicant to prove that his registration had been contrary to the rules applicable at the material time, which he had failed to do.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152787
10 février 2015
Has the applicant suffered discrimination, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention? 6.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13010
17 novembre 2020
Law – Article 3: Since the first applicant had not yet been deported, the question of whether he would face a real risk of being subjected to ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 upon his return
ECLI:CEDH:001-205011
7 septembre 2020
two jurisdictions thus found that the applicant’s ex ‑ wife had in fact abducted the applicant’s son but due to the protraction of the return proceedings the boy’s return to Scotland would be contrary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612DEC004465714
12 juin 2018
The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the domestic authorities had determined his tax liability in a way that was contrary to the relevant domestic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629DEC002539320
29 juin 2023
remedy for individuals who considered that they had been subjected to inadequate conditions of detention and who were no longer, when they lodged their action, held in conditions that were allegedly contrary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0831DEC003806616
31 août 2023
ECLI:CEDH:001-242128
29 janvier 2025
In his view, such a state of affairs was contrary to Article 23 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which stated that “[i]n case the proceedings are reopened, judge[s] who took part in the previous
ECLI:CEDH:001-158068
23 septembre 2015
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their home and private life in the present case, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Udovičić v.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10316
25 novembre 2014
In 2003, pursuant to a provision inserted into the Latvian Criminal Code in 1993, they were convicted of crimes contrary to Article 68 1 of the Criminal Code for having actively participated in
ECLI:CEDH:001-126930
13 septembre 2013
The applicant also alleges a breach of Article 14 of the Convention to the extent that, contrary to the other victim’s family members, she was excluded from the ceremony on account of the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC001391908
22 juin 2010
Therefore, at the present time there is no imminent risk of the applicant being deported or the alleged risk of treatment contrary to the Convention materialising since the applicant is not subject to