June 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Nina Vajić,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Corneliu Bîrsan,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Egbert Myjer,   Ineta Ziemele,   Luis López Guerra,   Linos-Alexandre

Rights (First Section), sitting on 14   January 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

In addition, it can be exercised by individuals and by those organising an assembly.

Accordingly, the Court concludes that the applicant can no longer claim to be a victim of the alleged violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. 26.

A d'un préjudice esthétique permanent évalué à 2 par l'expert sur une échelle de 1 à 7 et consistant en une altération de la marche nécessitant une canne.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, can be summarised as follows. A.     The main set of proceedings 7.

It includes not only a person’s physical and psychological integrity, but can sometimes also embrace aspects of an individual’s physical and social identity.

It follows that, to the extent that the applicant company relies on the Succession Agreement (see paragraphs 15, 26-27, 30, 34 and 45-47 above), its proprietary interest cannot be characterised as an “

The Court cannot speculate on the outcome of the proceedings had the applicants’ action been examined in full compliance with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention.

When the latter are obliged to act in order to enforce a judgment and they fail to do so, their inaction can engage the State’s responsibility under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis

Both plates have small holes pierced with a drill; however the holes do not coincide so that nothing can be passed though the window.

    The Court can find no sufficient justification for such a lapse of time, the responsibility for which lies entirely with the authorities. 27.

50157/06 Stefan MANGIR and others against Moldova and Russia lodged on 1 December 2006 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicants, Mr Ştefan Mangîr, Vitalie Vasiliev, Igor Daţco, Constantin Condrea, Alexandru

    The effect of paragraph 55.10 was subsequently qualified in that the words “which cannot be satisfactorily managed in detention” were added with effect from 25 August 2010.

Benoit DEVIGNOT, Conseiller Mme Evelyne DE BEAUMONT, Conseillère Greffier, lors des débats : Monsieur Alexandre VAZZANA ARRÊT : Contradictoire Prononcé publiquement par mise à disposition de

CIVIL 2ème chambre section construction JUGEMENT DU 06 Janvier 2026 DÉCISION N° 26/007 N° RG 23/02516 - N° Portalis DBWQ-W-B7H-PGQK DEMANDEURS : Monsieur [Z] [I] né le 23 Novembre 1977 à Cannes

-D...Alexandre, domicilié ... -D...Didier, domicilié ...(13o) - D...Laurent, domicilié ... -D...Marie, domiciliée 2 Cami de H...-65140- BAZILLAC -D...Philippe, domicilié ...

Alexandre Z..., - Mme Michèle A..., épouse Z..., - M. Jean-Claude B..., - M.