AVRIL 2026 * 6ème Chambre - N° RG : 2024F00366 (N° IP : 2023I04248) – 2025F01122 SA ALLIANZ C/ SARL [Q] [Y] Monsieur [C] [M] SAS PROGEAS agissant en qualité de mandataire de la SA LLOYD'S INSURANCE COMPANY

    Criminal proceedings against the applicant On 17 October 1996 the applicant was taken into police custody on suspicion of complicity in an armed robbery and homicide in Bursa.

The appellate court did not specify the procedural status of company A. The applicant lodged an appeal in cassation.

INC, anciennement dénommée Ansa bottle company INC, dont le siège est 70, New Canaan, ..., et également à : - société Ansa company INC, dont le siège est 425, Y...

He argued, inter alia , that the plots of land transferred to the applicants had been earlier transferred for permanent use to agricultural company B. 4.

Ponsot, conseiller doyen et Mme Dumont, greffier de chambre, la chambre commerciale, financière et économique de la Cour de cassation, composée des président et conseillers précités, après en avoir

Me Jean GERARD, avocat au barreau de PARIS substitué par Me Hélène GUILLOT, avocat au barreau de PARIS PARTIES CONVOQUEES LE : 16 Novembre 2006 DEBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU : 29 Mai 2007 COMPOSITION

Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour, composée de : C. Brisset, présidente A. Pierre-Blanchard, conseillère F.

    In 2001 the applicant purchased a flat from a private company P. 5.

to company B. for one year without her consent, and that she had not received any compensation in return.

Julians, which they acquired, from CEL (a company of which they were shareholders and which was in liquidation), on 25   January 1986.

based in Teheran.

    In particular, the Public Prosecutor stated that investigations into fraudulent bankruptcy had begun after company C. had been declared bankrupt as it was suspected that the funds used to

1937 and lives in Šaľa.

    The first and second applicants were born in 1963 and 1948 and live in Helsinki. The applicant company is based in Helsinki.

    By way of an action in the Prešov District Court (case no. 9C 207/00), an individual sued a municipality and a public-transport company of that municipality for compensation in connection

    The applicants were injured, inter alia , in the course of discharging their duties.

    In April 2017 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the State in which he claimed compensation in respect of pecuniary damage caused by unlawful actions of the police, under

Convention’s entry into force in respect of Armenia.