xa0; Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found in this case, through the adoption in 1990 of emergency measures to speed

violation found in this case, notably through the setting up of administrative courts of appeal, the redefinition of the competences of the Conseil d’Etat and the increase of personnel and means in order to speed

violation found in this case, notably through the setting up of administrative courts of appeal, the redefinition of the competences of the Conseil d’Etat and the increase of personnel and means in order to speed

Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;        Whereas, the Government of Italy informed the Committee of Ministers that the reform adopted to speed

xa0; Whereas the Government of Italy recalled that measures had already been taken to prevent the repetition of the violation found in this case, through the adoption in 1990 of emergency measures to speed

as was found in this case, notably through the setting up of administrative courts of appeal, the redefinition of the Conseil d'Etat's competence, the increase in personnel and material in order to speed

as found in this case, notably through the setting up of administrative courts of appeal, the redefinition of the Conseil d'Etat's competencies, and the increase of personnel and material in order to speed

Article 32, paragraph 4 (art. 32-4), of the Convention to abide by them;        Whereas, the Government of Italy informed the Committee of Ministers that the reform adopted to speed

of the same road, in excess of the speed limit imposed by a road sign (Section 52, sub-section A (10) (a) of the Act).

COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention of the excessive length of the civil proceedings and the alleged lack of effective remedies to speed them up.

  Subsequently, Bregenz District Authority opened criminal proceedings for exceeding the speed limit against unknown offenders and ordered the applicant as the registered car owner, under section

JUDICIAIRE DE BORDEAUX 7EME CHAMBRE CIVILE JUGEMENT DU 1er OCTOBRE 2024 54A N° RG 23/00459 N° Portalis DBX6-W-B7H- XMSC Minute n°2024/ AFFAIRE : SCI LG LAMY C/ [C] [G] exerçant sous l’enseigne SPEED

[L] [X] né le [Date naissance 1] 1966 à [Localité 1] de nationalité française demeurant [Adresse 1] [Adresse 1] représenté et assisté par Me Vincent Speder, membre de la SCP Speder-Dusart, avocat

SPEEDY FRANCE prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège, représentant : Me Sophie PORCHEROT de la SELARL REYNAUD AVOCATS, Plaidant/Postulant, avocat au barreau

SPEEDY FRANCE prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège, représentant : Me Sophie PORCHEROT de la SELARL REYNAUD AVOCATS, Plaidant/Postulant, avocat au barreau

SPEEDY FRANCE prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège, représentant : Me Sophie PORCHEROT de la SELARL REYNAUD AVOCATS, Plaidant/Postulant, avocat au barreau

ENTREPRENEURS DE TRAVAUX PUBLICS, dont le siège social est 31, rue Le Peletier 75453 Paris Cedex 09 comparant par Me Rémy Bellenger, 84, rue d'Amsterdam 75009 Paris avocat (C279) Partie défenderesse : SAS SPEC

under Article 3 of the Convention about the lack of grounds for his placement under the special prison regime, and about the conditions of such regime, in particular as regards the time he is allowed to spend