CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 564 résultats pour « STUBBE Marc »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC003982008

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2010

30 mars 2010

The authorisation included the use of audio and video recording, was valid for ten days and expired on 3 March 2006.

Page 44 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0914DEC003723197

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 1999

14 septembre 1999

The applicant replied on 23 March 1999.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312DEC007047514

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2019

12 mars 2019

It flows from the Court’s judgment of 22 March 2012 in the case of Konstatin Markin v. Russia , no.   30078/06, § 129 et seq.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0411JUD004651920

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2023

11 avril 2023

Incidents in March 2012 12 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223754

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

On 21/03/2018 the Yoshkar-Ola Town Court of Mari El Republic rejected the applicant’s complaint against the last refusal. On 03/05/2018 the Supreme Court of the Mari El Republic upheld this decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD001669504

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2010

15 juillet 2010

    On 2 March 2009 the President of the Fifth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC001449113

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

He also submitted certificates of his studies in Finland and relied on them as grounds for a residence permit. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD002958209

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2021

7 décembre 2021

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Russian organisation, Yakut Republican Trade-Union Federation (“the applicant federation”), on 28   March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1026JUD003739597

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2010

26 octobre 2010

Turkey (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, § 102, Series A no.   310, and (merits) 18   December 1996, §   32, Reports 1996-VI). 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145900

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2014

30 juin 2014

However, on 30 March 2012 the Moscow Housing Department applied to the Timiryazevskiy District Court of Moscow for a duplicate of the writ of execution.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-156188

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2015

19 juin 2015

The court’s reference about studies in the United States as a basis to identify a person was not sufficiently weighty either.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307JUD006443601

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

On 22 December 1998 he submitted to the appellate court two missing pages of one appendix and on 30 March 1999 his lawyer’s invoice on legal aid. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC001854591

Admin. suprême

17 mai 1995

17 mai 1995

       On 2 March 1994 the Commission decided to communicate the application to the respondent Government and to request them to submit their written observations on admissibility

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001863903

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

On 29 March 1999 he sold the flat to the B. family. According to the applicant, she learned about the judgment and the subsequent transactions concerning the flat in May 1999, when the B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0112DEC001841191

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 1994

12 janvier 1994

    Particular circumstances of the case         Since 1985 the first applicant company has operated a food stuff super market in Wels (Austria), organised

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD000923511

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

    On 2 March 2009, 31 August 2009 and 9 June 2010 respectively, all applicants lodged their constitutional appeals. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD003961108

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2017

4 avril 2017

, the Court does not find it necessary to examine essentially the same complaint raised by Mr Zoran Ranković and Mr Ivan Bojanić under Article 13 of the Convention (see   mutatis mutandis , Kin-Stib

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516JUD002391515

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2017

16 mai 2017

    On 31 March 2015 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal finding that it is not vested with the power of the insolvency court to enable the payments of the claims recognized

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520DEC001143815

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2021

20 mai 2021

    The applicants, Ms Anne-Marie Yazbek and Ms Myrna Yazbek, are two sisters who were born in 1984 and 1975 respectively and live in Skopje. The applicants were represented by Mr G.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0606DEC006085600

Admin. suprême

6 juin 2002

6 juin 2002

He submits that during this course he studied very hard and was on occasions able to get the highest marks in his class in mock examinations.

Source officielle