Merits The parties’ submissions 72.

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Emmerson and Sir Sidney Kentridge. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.     The planning background 7.

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Cabral Barreto, Ms Santilli, Mr   Sabbeone and Mr Raimondi. 7.

  The merely general reference to the problem of dependency did not suffice to prove partiality, which had to be examined in each individual case.   35.

Le rapport de l'AMF, en date du 3 mai 2005, a été adressé à la Cour le 28 septembre 2005.

The applicant met Toni on 19 and 21 March, 15 May and 5 and 14 June 1984, on the latter’s initiative on each occasion, as the applicant did not know his real identity, address or telephone number. 13.

    The applicant company and the Government each filed written observations on the admissibility and merits of the case.

It had been merely the applicant’s defence against the charges and had been treated by the Supreme Court as such.

It will therefore deal with the objection in its examination of the merits below (see paragraphs73-74 below). B.     Incompatibility ratione materiae 1.

Such address followed soon. It came from a friend of mine, [A.D.].

In the Court’s opinion, the part of the sentence just quoted states merely a rule going to the merits.

The Court heard addresses by Mrs. Maier for the Government, by Mr. Weitzel for the Commission and by Mr. Wingerter for the applicant, as well as their replies to its questions. 10.

Whilst the appeal as regards the second applicant was rejected as incomplete, the same remedy concerning the first applicant was rejected on its merits.

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Sołhaj and Mr Drzewicki, and also Mr   Drzewicki's and Mr Tor's replies to questions put by the judges of the Court. THE FACTS I.

Merits The parties’ submissions 29.

He stated that the overview was merely a conclusion of the Tax Fraud Office the merits of which he could not examine without having access to the documents and records on which it was based. 23.

The decision, in assessing the circumstances in which the interference with the email account intercepted by the [defendant] took place, merely rejects in a reasoned and reasonable way the intervention

It appears that the part of the document containing the addressee had been deleted (see paragraph   35 below for details). 27.

    The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 7.