CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD006585901
7 décembre 2006
On 22 May 2000 the applicant's counsel and his father inquired with the Derbent Town Prosecutor about the destiny of their complaint of 23 March 2000.
Page 44 sur 51
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD002718303
22 janvier 2009
One of the servicemen showed Isa Zaurbekov’s passport to the masked man and asked if that was him. The masked man shook his head in the negative.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD002807006
9 avril 2009
Platou Amble, Attorney General’s Office (Civil Matters). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0729JUD001403003
29 juillet 2010
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Shchukin and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0211JUD004358902
11 février 2010
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Salakhutdinov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0605JUD003252605
5 juin 2008
On 17 March 2006, the West Attica Primary Education Directorate sent a letter to the Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0602JUD006646001
2 juin 2005
Jebens, judges , and Mr S. Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 12 May 2005, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD001284605
4 décembre 2008
By a decision of 17 March 2006, the Court gave notice of the complaint concerning Article 6 of the Convention to the Government.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003585902
13 juillet 2006
Property is protected by the State; rights deriving therefrom, however, may not be exercised contrary to public interest. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0210JUD006931501
10 février 2005
Jebens, judges , and Mr S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0925JUD001969202
25 septembre 2008
In criminal matters the provision of full, detailed information concerning the charges against a defendant, and consequently the legal characterisation that the court might adopt in the matter, is an essential
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD000106605
10 février 2011
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Dorogaykin v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD004641099
18 octobre 2006
On 16 May 1993 the applicant was involved in a dispute in a café. He pulled a loaded gun and shot a man, wounding him in the leg.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628JUD005559709
28 juin 2011
De Gaetano, judges, and Fatoş Araci, Deputy Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 29 March, 24 May and 7 June 2011, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1214DEC004016706
14 décembre 2011
The request was rejected by the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on 23 March.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122DEC003443804
22 novembre 2007
I agree that this may frequently be the case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0715JUD000914308
15 juillet 2010
The court may decide to hold an oral hearing on account of the complexity of the dispute or if it otherwise finds it useful for better clarification of the matter at issue.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001307103
2 novembre 2006
‘Whether the federal party was informed or not is a matter on which everyone may now form his or her own view’, the judge summed up exclusively for all the journalists in the courtroom.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD007423901
26 juillet 2007
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0126DEC001317803
26 janvier 2006
Jebens , juges , P. Martens, juge ad hoc, et de M. S.