Par mémoire enregistré le 22 mai 2024, la société Eiffage Energie Systèmes, représentée par Me Langlais, conclut au rejet de la requête et demande que soit mise à la charge de M.

   On 18 April 1988 Dr Debled appealed on points of law against the decision of 15 March 1988.

On 9 March 2007 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of drug trafficking. In the course of the arrest the applicant was allegedly beaten up by the police.

    By a judgment of 22 March 1979, the Milan District Court declared this company bankrupt.

    The applicant was granted legal aid on 1 March 1995. The legal aid order covered both the committal hearings and the actual trial.

Accordingly, in a further judgment of 16 March 2007 the court lowered the applicant’s taxable income to SEK 125,008 for each of the assessment years.

Prior to the charging the investigator appointed a Turkish ‑ language interpreter. On 24 July 2001 the applicant was released on bail.

La clôture de l'instruction a été fixée au 24 février 2023 par une ordonnance du 6 mars précédent.

     The period to be taken into consideration began on 15 March 1978 when the proceedings were instituted against the defendants in the Melfi District Court.

    On 18   March 2006 investigator P. stated that the applicant had been brought to his office at 5.50   p.m. on 12   March 2006.

On 25 March 2009 the applicant objected to the trial court’s decision to withdraw the indictment and stated that: “...

Blanche Marckx. 13.

  On 4 April 1986, the President gave the applicant leave to use the Italian language (Rule 27 § 3).   5.

ne constituent pas des vices d'une gravité suffisante pour justifier l'annulation du marché.

It would thus have been preferable for the Supreme Court to engage explicitly with the language of the Court of Appeal and not simply to remain silent. 36.

  In March 1996, counsel advised that more investigation and information was required before grounds of appeal could be settled.

On 22 March 2000 the Administrative Court of Appeal rejected the appeal (decision no. 80/2000).

On 22 March 2000 the Administrative Court of Appeal rejected the appeal (decision no. 80/2000).

On 22 March 2000 the Administrative Court of Appeal rejected the appeal (decision no. 80/2000).