The drug seized during the search was adduced as evidence against the applicant. 11.

In particular, he alleged that T.A. had been absent for approximately thirty to forty minutes during the confrontation.

    Was the reliance of the respective witnesses on the right not to incriminate themselves in refusing to testify during the trials a good reason for reading out their pre-trial statements (

(a)     If yes, did the national authorities make reasonable effort to secure the presence of the victims during trials as requested by the applicant?

    Complaints The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he was ill-treated by the police during his apprehension on 23 April 2008.

    The use of handcuffs against the applicant during the court hearings 9.

Russia , no. 38004/12, §§ 144-50, 17 July 2018, concerning detention in a metal cage or a glass cabin during court hearings; and Tomov and Others v.

within the meaning of Article   5 §   4 of the Convention, in respect of complaints concerning (i) the unlawfulness of the arrest and pre-trial detention; (ii) the lack of an oral hearing during

  On 27 August 2005, following a meeting with the parliamentarian during which the transfer of money had taken place, the two applicants were arrested and searched.

transport - transport on numerous occasions during the court proceedings until 17/04/2019 by van and detention in convoy cell, overcrowding, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air; &

They also complain under Article 8 of the Convention that the domestic authorities arbitrarily refused to allow them family visits during their pre-trial detention. 2.

The evidence provided by those officers concerned the demonstration held on 16   December 2010, during which they reiterated the incident report they had drawn up themselves.

The applicant was allegedly ill ‑ treated during her police custody.

During the subsequent questioning, she admitted her involvement in the crime. On 29 January 2015 the applicant was presented to a judge and an arrest warrant was issued. 3 .

  42940/06, § 60, 25   October 2007),   Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport by van from the detention facility (and back) to the

The applicant was subjected to verbal abuse during the pre-trial detention. His request to see his lawyer or his family was rejected.

    The applicant complained of the inadequate conditions of detention during his transport and poor conditions of detention in a remand facility.

Furthermore, the domestic courts had failed to hear him and to summon him correctly during the trial proceedings. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES   1.

    The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.