between the child and its parents.

the child was possibly conceived.

She also asked the court to make a residence order in respect of P. in her favour, to set a schedule in respect of the applicant’s contact with the child, and to order him to pay child maintenance.

psychologist or child psychiatrist; -the examination of the child by the child psychiatrist at the material time was done by means of play, as was done in this type of cases, with the help of anatomical

of [the applicant] produces stress and fear in the child.

despite mother’s opposition: violation Facts : The first applicant is a severely handicapped child; the second applicant is his mother.

It held that when parents are married, their child will be given the name which they have chosen as family name, which can be either the father’s or the mother’s.

paternity of the child shall be established in court proceedings on the application of either parent.

A. filed a civil lawsuit with the Ukrainian courts, seeking an order for the return of the child to Djibouti.

a residence order in respect of his child following separation from his partner or wife.

In particular, by a decision of 15 December 2016, the City of Zagreb granted the applicant financial assistance for child-rearing parents.

Neither parent was otherwise allowed to remove the child from the jurisdiction without the other party’s consent or the court’s authorisation.

The applicants also lodged the present application on behalf of their child, A.

VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 1134 ET 1162 DU CODE CIVIL, 7 ALINEA 1ER, DE LA LOI DU 20 AVRIL 1810, 102 ET 105 DU DECRET DU 20 JUILLET 1972, DEFAUT ET INSUFFISANCE DE MOTIFS, MANQUE DE BASE LEGALE : ATTENDU QUE CHIRY

A..., membre de la liste " Avec vous changeons Saint-Chély " lors du premier tour de l'élection municipale de Saint-Chély d'Apcher du 15 mars 2020.

Bailiffs, accompanied by police officers, made a number of visits, including to M.Ş.’s home, in an attempt to find the child but were unsuccessful.

The parent residing separately from the child is entitled to maintain contact with the child and to participate in his upbringing and education.

court should have granted the applicant’s lawyer’s request to have the child questioned anew, in the lawyer’s presence.