Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928DEC004458798
28 septembre 2006
28 septembre 2006
the demonstrations held on 11 August 1996.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528DEC004069498
28 mai 2002
28 mai 2002
On 5 August 1998 the court held a hearing. By a judgment of 14 August 1998 the applicant’s claim was partly dismissed and partly allowed. The judgment was served on the applicant three months later.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139985
9 décembre 2013
9 décembre 2013
On 15 August 2008 the Donsk Town Court extended the applicant’s detention until 25 August 2008, to reach the total amount of detention of twelve months (to be calculated under Article 109 of the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112940
1 août 2012
1 août 2012
On 13 August 2004 the Kharkiv District Court remanded the applicant in custody pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC000094402
17 novembre 2005
17 novembre 2005
The applicant appealed on the grounds inter alia that there had been no grounds for reopening the case and quashing the judgment of 31 August 1999.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130DEC004952816
30 novembre 2021
30 novembre 2021
The applicant lodged a constitutional complaint, the scope of which he explicitly limited to the period from March 2010 to August 2011.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161862
8 mars 2016
8 mars 2016
It also extended the applicant’s detention for another three months until 27 August 2014.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925JUD003124696
25 septembre 2001
25 septembre 2001
On 8 August 1995 the applicant was interrogated by the police officers.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-908
15 juin 2010
15 juin 2010
He further claimed that, between August 2003 and August 2004 he was held in an ordinary cell in the detention facility, and not provided with regular check-ups, medication or a special diet.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC004981608
9 décembre 2014
9 décembre 2014
On 15 August 2008 the applicant sent his first letter to the Court, which read as follows: “Preliminary complaint.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211607
12 juillet 2021
12 juillet 2021
On 28 August 2020, the Court applied an interim measure in the case under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the respondent Government “to provide the applicant, until a decision on the merits
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112509
10 juillet 2012
10 juillet 2012
Another extension was authorised on 26 August 2006, in the absence of the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167727
23 septembre 2016
23 septembre 2016
On 4 August 2014 the Moscow City Court upheld the detention order of 4 July 2014 on appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161917
16 mars 2016
16 mars 2016
According to the applicant, only after repeated requests had this judgment been served on him on 24 August 2009. On 8 August 2014 the applicant’s lawyer, Mr I.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC003006105
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
On 14 August 2002 the Katowice District Court remanded the applicant in custody on suspicion of robbery.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117012
7 février 2013
7 février 2013
On 8 August 2002, the applicant appealed against that decision to the Social Appeal Board, which by decision of 4 August 2003 partly found for the applicant and increased the degree of her loss of working
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-215571
10 janvier 2022
10 janvier 2022
On 9 August 2019 the applicant was again placed in house arrest, which order was extended with fifteen subsequent decisions adopted between 23 August 2019 and 7 October 2020.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147899
13 octobre 2014
13 octobre 2014
On 27 August 1983 the applicant married B. On 12 August 1992 the applicant’s wife gave birth to a girl K.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181507
16 février 2018
16 février 2018
On 27 August 2014 he reported to the prison administration that he had religious and dietary requirements as described above.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1206JUD006400100
6 décembre 2005
6 décembre 2005
A medical certificate indicates that she was on sick leave until 13 August 1999. A different employee of the advocate was on leave from 2 to 6 August 1999. She came back to work on 9 August 1999.
Source officiellePage 44 sur 2136