Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3518
24 janvier 2006
24 janvier 2006
for failing to observe the rules.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157807
17 septembre 2015
17 septembre 2015
Rules 33 and 41 are, it must be emphasised, default rules. They apply only in so far as the parties have not agreed to modify or disapply them: see section 9 of the 2010 Act.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-98
16 mai 1997
16 mai 1997
26 of Rules of Court B (2), _______________ Notes by the Registrar 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0424JUD004066398
24 avril 2007
24 avril 2007
rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court) (see Maurice v.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522JUD003045396
22 mai 2001
22 mai 2001
The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1102JUD003575697
2 novembre 1999
2 novembre 1999
Conforti, the judge elected in respect of Italy (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 26 § 1 (a) of the Rules of the Court), and Mr C.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1209DEC001268787
9 décembre 1988
9 décembre 1988
HC 169 (paragraph 54 of these Rules was subsequently amended to remove differences in treatment between men and women).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0719JUD004303811
19 juillet 2022
19 juillet 2022
They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of the Rules of Court. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5733
13 mars 2001
13 mars 2001
They had in the meantime lodged an application with the Court on 4 October and sought the application of Rule 39.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1001DEC007518411
1 octobre 2013
1 octobre 2013
Rules of Court) should domestic re ‑ examination of his case be unfavourable. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC000308307
18 novembre 2008
18 novembre 2008
39 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0222JUD000988605
22 février 2007
22 février 2007
The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 7. On 19 January 2007 the case was transferred to the Third Section (Rule 52 § 1).
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412JUD003468897
12 avril 2001
12 avril 2001
The application was allocated to the Second section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;SCREENINGPANEL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-106
11 avril 1997
11 avril 1997
26 of Rules of Court B (2), _______________ Notes by the Registrar 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522JUD003676097
22 mai 2001
22 mai 2001
The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0511DEC001051083
11 mai 1988
11 mai 1988
43 para. 3 (a) of the Rules of Procedure.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2610967-2839343
20 janvier 2009
20 janvier 2009
The Court further decided to continue to indicate to the Swedish Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that it was desirable in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC003837420
6 septembre 2022
6 septembre 2022
On 20 August 2020, the date when the present application was lodged, the applicant requested priority treatment of his case under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court on the grounds that he was
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0922JUD001356788
22 septembre 1993
22 septembre 1993
In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant company stated that it wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1007DEC003449112
7 octobre 2014
7 octobre 2014
Rule 4 (2), in so far as relevant read as follows: “The application of appeal shall be made within twenty days from the date of the decision appealed from” Rule 6 thereof reads as follows: “Once a case
Source officiellePage 43 sur 2215
SARL DE RULAN
29/05/2026
Voir →
SARL DE RULAN
19/04/2026
Voir →
AUDIT VERGES RULAND
13/11/2025
Voir →
RULAND, Marie-Paule
21/10/2025
Voir →
Rulaafoo
17/10/2025
Voir →