CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD002463514
22 avril 2021
On 28 July 2011 the police reported that the witnesses could not be found at their addresses in Kharkiv.
Page 43 sur 145
Pôle 5 - Chambre 8
6163cfff74df0e9c0194f823
12 janvier 2010
ayant son siège [Adresse 94] [Adresse 94] [Localité 86] assignée - défaillante SA CRÉDIT LYONNAIS prise en la personne de son Président du Conseil d'administration ayant son siège [Adresse
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324JUD006320700
24 mars 2005
She gave the name of a third person, with an incomplete address and was fined for failure to comply with section 103 § 2. 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0312JUD001849815
12 mars 2020
On 10 September 2013 the Narimanov District Court delivered its judgment on the merits and ordered the applicant’s disbarment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0623JUD001508889
23 juin 1994
The Court heard addresses by Mr Meyer-Ladewig, Mr von Mühlendahl, Mr Frowein and Mr Meilicke, and also replies to its questions. AS TO THE FACTS 7.
CASELAW;ADVISORYOPINIONS;PROTOCOL16;OPINIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-6380464-8364383
10 avril 2019
The applicants specified that, in accordance with Californian law, the surrogate mother had not been remunerated but had merely received expenses (see paragraph 8 of the judgment). 11.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630DEC002117593
30 juin 1993
On 7 March 1991 the High Court on ex parte application by the local authority issued an injunction to restrain anyone from publishing or broadcasting information identifying M., her address, educational
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC001354510
9 octobre 2012
applicant had failed to sufficiently deal with the Cantonal Court’s considerations and that he had not at all addressed the court’s observations as to his appeal’s lack of prospect of success but had merely
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159143
9 novembre 2015
Court observes that the complainant justifies her conduct towards the employer (namely, her media statements), on account of which the employer summarily dismissed her, by arguing that she had been merely
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14569
3 février 2026
Russia (no. 4) - 4743/21 and 37083/21 Judgment 3.2.2026 [Section III] Article 2 Positive obligations Article 2-1 Life Domestic authorities’ failure to address applicant’s complaint concerning the real
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001222886
25 octobre 1990
Mr Keus was notified of the decision - which described him as having no known address - on 19 January, when he telephoned the clinic.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD004492009
30 janvier 2020
Accordingly, the Court decides to join the Government’s objection to the merits of application no. 44920/09.
3e chambre civile
696a3780cdc6046d4785c420
15 janvier 2026
MUTUELLE DES ARCHITECTES FRANCAIS [Adresse 4] [Localité 13] Représentées par Me Julie ABEN, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER INTIMES : Monsieur [O] [D] de nationalité Française [Adresse
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0227JUD007625111
27 février 2020
Merits The parties’ arguments 15.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD001921891
1 juillet 1997
The Court heard addresses by them. AS TO THE FACTS I. The particular circumstances of the case 7. On 25 September 1991 at about 11 p.m.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC002367408
13 septembre 2011
The efforts made by the Kleve Regional Court in order to obtain C.’s address had been insufficient.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0917REP003146496
17 septembre 1998
The order can further be issued if no permanent address or place of residence of the suspect in the Netherlands can be established and he is suspected of an offence which the courts examine and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131JUD005025299
31 janvier 2006
On 28 November 1995 the first applicant’s name was removed from the municipal register as living at the same address as his spouse.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD004436302
1 février 2007
On 23 February 2004 the Constitutional Court admitted their complaint for examination on the merits. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0614JUD006144400
14 juin 2005
The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).