It may be subject to editorial revision . In the case of Wersel v.

  27693/95, §   71, 31   May 2005). 57.

Twelve days later another young man who had been detained in a Grozny suburb on 25   May   2000 and then released met with the applicant and told him that he had been detained with his son in

Jebens, judges, and Mr S.

The judge and the parties to the proceedings may not be present in the room with the child, but the parties may ask questions through the investigating judge, psychologist, counsellor or other qualified

The Grand Chamber may proceed in the same manner in the present case. 53.

Thus, the applicant may not be regarded as a “victim” of his rights in this respect. 28.

That man, whose name he could not recall, had died in 2002.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of X v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kononenko v.

Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

Thus, the applicants may not be regarded as “victims” of a breach of their rights in this respect. 36.

In matters of general policy, as in the present case, the role of the domestic policy-maker should be given special weight. (b)     The applicants 26.

    On 8 March 2002 the Court of Cassation rejected the applicant’s appeals concerning the four sets of proceedings.

    On 16 May 1995 the Appeals Board of the Vienna Municipality ( Berufungssenat ) dismissed the appeal. 18.

Russia (dec.), no. 72776/01, 9 March 2006; Fadin , no. 58079/00, §§ 30-37, 27 July 2006; and Radchikov v. Russia , no. 65582/01, §§ 54-55, 24 May 2007).

Jebens ,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges , and Mr S.

Jebens,     G. Malinverni, juges, et de M. S.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mirosław Garlicki v.