applicant’s complaints under Articles 5 § 1 and 7 § 1 of the Convention concerning the prolongation of his preventive detention beyond the former ten-year maximum duration were communicated to the German

SECTION and application no. 81996/17 Niko HÄRTING against Germany lodged on 30 November 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the strategic (as opposed to individual) monitoring of

Convention concerning the order by the Trier police for the applicant to be finger- and palmprinted, photographed, measured and his outward physical characteristics recorded, was communicated to the German

Germany (referral) - 10211/12 and 27505/14 Judgment 2.2.2017 [Section V] Article 7 Article 7-1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Retrospective preventive detention of convicted murderer on basis of psychiatric

font-size:10pt } .sC36A6361 { font-family:Arial; color:#000000 } .sB853CD26 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 39562/18 Edeltraud SCHLICK-LABE against Germany

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS     503   5.7.2001   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENTS CONCERNING Germany

German, Romanian Manuela BRILLAT, Lawyer Immovable property located in Bucharest, District no. 4, Calea Șerban Vodă no.

and the availability of an effective domestic remedy in this respect, and under Article 8 concerning the restrictions on the applicant’s right to have contact with her child were communicated to the German

  Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, §§ 103-108, ECHR 2006-VII; Herbst v.   Germany , no. 20027/02, §§   65-66, 11 January 2007). 45.

    The applicant is a German national who was born in 1952 and lives in Berlin (Germany). A.     The general background 11.

, who was born in 1954 and lives in Laupheim (Germany).

There was no German law which prohibited linking criticism to a particular person.

national born in 1947, lives in Hamburg (Germany).

The front page of the leaflets contained the following text in bold letters (all quotes translated from German): “In the day clinic Dr M./Dr R.

    The applicant, the National Democratic Party of Germany ( Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands , NPD), is a German political party. It was represented before the Court by Mr P.

  The applicant is a German citizen, born in 1928 and at present residing at H., Germany.

Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)110   Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of Herz against Germany   Introductory case summary   The case concerns

Germany , 19844/92 , Commission decision of 9   July 1992; T.P. and K.M. v.   the United Kingdom [GC], 28945/95 , 10   May 2001; K. and T. v.

It therefore decided to invite the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany to submit any relevant observations and, in the meanwhile, to adjourn its examination of the question whether any further