CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD003385103
7 décembre 2006
The Government contended that the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed for the delay.
Page 43 sur 123
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1579030-1652978
2 février 2006
Detainees had to sleep on the cement floor, which they covered with dirty blankets. The cell was lit by a single electric bulb.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD002545203
11 janvier 2007
The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay. The applicant disagreed. 15.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930DEC004397898
30 septembre 2003
Although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the venues available to him under domestic law in order for him to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions necessarily prolong
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD000894407
10 février 2011
However, in respect of her procedural requests and properly filed appeals, the Court finds that she merely exercised her procedural rights and cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to her under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD001979804
1 juin 2006
Furthermore, the applicant cannot be blamed for the authorities’ failure to update him on the progress of the enforcement proceedings.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3735269-4261738
7 novembre 2011
with Article 14 The Court noted that it had already indicated, in the context of the complaints under Article 8, why it considered that the investigation and discharge together with the blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD004403805
10 avril 2012
It further observes that the applicant enabled the enforcement of the judgment debt by submitting the writ of enforcement to two State bodies and cannot be blamed for the State’s subsequent failure to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC000171006
11 septembre 2012
He had to sleep on the concrete floor without a mattress or blanket. The cell was damp, and was infested with insects. 6.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118704
18 mars 2013
} FIFTH SECTION Application no. 54146/09 Roman BÁTĚK and others against the Czech Republic lodged on 2 October 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Roman Bátěk, Radek Blažej
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD007552413
1 octobre 2019
The automatic and blanket prolongation of the applicant’s detention is further proved by the first several decisions ‒ of March and April 2012 (see paragraph 9 above) ‒ in which the courts re-used the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621DEC003470604
21 juin 2016
While the applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interest (see, mutatis mutandis , Yağcı and Sargın v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD000345913
20 juillet 2017
and 17 day(s) 130 inmate(s) 2.1 m² 6 toilet(s) overcrowding, small walking yard – 73 sq.m. for 260 inmates, six sinks, poor food quality, no warm seasonal clothes and shoes and blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD005542713
22 février 2018
6 day(s) 140 inmate(s) 2.3 m² 6 toilet(s) 8 sinks, no hot water, no separate premises for drying clothes, no educational and rest premises, poor food quality, no warm seasonal clothes and shoes and blanket
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC001985406
17 mai 2016
Therefore, as confirmed by the domestic courts, MIC could not be blamed for such changes. 23.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0126JUD005947411
26 janvier 2016
The automatic and blanket prolongation of the applicant’s detention is further proved by the two last decisions ‒ of May and August 2011 (see paragraph 8 above) ‒ in which the courts re-used the same text
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0617DEC007399401
17 juin 2004
The applicant took procedural steps to defend his legal position and could not be blamed for any abuse of his procedural rights under the national law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0512JUD000185308
12 mai 2011
Moreover, in respect of her procedural requests and appeals, the Court notes that she merely exercised her procedural rights and cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to her under the domestic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001580804
27 janvier 2009
The Court notes that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD002259104
10 août 2006
The Government contended that the Bailiffs’ Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.