CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 445 résultats pour « Blavet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD003385103

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2006

7 décembre 2006

The Government contended that the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and could not be blamed for the delay.

Page 43 sur 123

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1579030-1652978

Admin. suprême

2 février 2006

2 février 2006

Detainees had to sleep on the cement floor, which they covered with dirty blankets. The cell was lit by a single electric bulb.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD002545203

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

The Government further maintained that the Bailiffs' Service had performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.     The applicant disagreed. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930DEC004397898

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2003

30 septembre 2003

Although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the venues available to him under domestic law in order for him to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions necessarily prolong

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD000894407

Admin. suprême

10 février 2011

10 février 2011

However, in respect of her procedural requests and properly filed appeals, the Court finds that she merely exercised her procedural rights and cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to her under

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD001979804

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

Furthermore, the applicant cannot be blamed for the authorities’ failure to update him on the progress of the enforcement proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3735269-4261738

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2011

7 novembre 2011

with Article 14     The Court noted that it had already indicated, in the context of the complaints under Article 8, why it considered that the investigation and discharge together with the blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD004403805

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

It further observes that the applicant enabled the enforcement of the judgment debt by submitting the writ of enforcement to two State bodies and cannot be blamed for the State’s subsequent failure to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC000171006

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

He had to sleep on the concrete floor without a mattress or blanket. The cell was damp, and was infested with insects. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118704

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2013

18 mars 2013

}       FIFTH SECTION Application no. 54146/09 Roman BÁTĚK and others against the Czech Republic lodged on 2 October 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS   The applicants, Roman Bátěk, Radek Blažej

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD007552413

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 2019

1 octobre 2019

The automatic and blanket prolongation of the applicant’s detention is further proved by the first several decisions ‒ of March and April 2012 (see paragraph 9 above) ‒ in which the courts re-used the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621DEC003470604

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

While the applicant cannot be blamed for taking full advantage of the resources afforded by national law in the defence of his interest (see, mutatis mutandis , Yağcı and Sargın v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0720JUD000345913

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2017

20 juillet 2017

and 17 day(s)   130 inmate(s) 2.1 m² 6 toilet(s)     overcrowding, small walking yard – 73 sq.m. for 260 inmates, six sinks, poor food quality, no warm seasonal clothes and shoes and blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD005542713

Admin. suprême

22 février 2018

22 février 2018

6 day(s) 140 inmate(s) 2.3 m² 6 toilet(s) 8 sinks, no hot water, no separate premises for drying clothes, no educational and rest premises, poor food quality, no warm seasonal clothes and shoes and blanket

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC001985406

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2016

17 mai 2016

Therefore, as confirmed by the domestic courts, MIC could not be blamed for such changes. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0126JUD005947411

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2016

26 janvier 2016

The automatic and blanket prolongation of the applicant’s detention is further proved by the two last decisions ‒ of May and August 2011 (see paragraph 8 above) ‒ in which the courts re-used the same text

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0617DEC007399401

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2004

17 juin 2004

The applicant took procedural steps to defend his legal position and could not be blamed for any abuse of his procedural rights under the national law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0512JUD000185308

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2011

12 mai 2011

Moreover, in respect of her procedural requests and appeals, the Court notes that she merely exercised her procedural rights and cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to her under the domestic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127DEC001580804

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

The Court notes that although a party to civil proceedings cannot be blamed for using the avenues available to him under domestic law in order to protect his interests, he must accept that such actions

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD002259104

Admin. suprême

10 août 2006

10 août 2006

The Government contended that the Bailiffs’ Service performed all necessary actions and cannot be blamed for the delay.

Source officielle