CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 465 résultats pour « Beccari »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC001281502

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2003

16 décembre 2003

In this connection they submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.

Page 43 sur 1524

← PrécédentSuivant →

Annonces BODACC123 résultats

Journal officiel
Dépôts des comptes

Beccaria

SIREN 879190858Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de grenoble

02/07/2026

Voir →

Créations

BECCARI, Marie, Christine

SIREN 999955081Greffe du Tribunal Judiciaire de Strasbourg

16/06/2026

Voir →

Immatriculations

BECCARIA, Pascale, ANGIONI

SIREN 482810124Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Manosque

immatriculation suite à transfert de l'établissement principal hors ressort.

17/03/2026

Voir →

Dépôts des comptes

FREDERIC BECCARIA CONSEIL

SIREN 852251834Greffe du Tribunal des Activités Economiques de paris

08/03/2026

Voir →

Modifications diverses

SOCIETE CIVILE DE PARTICIPATION FINANCIERE EVELYNE BECCARIA

SIREN 502960065Greffe du Tribunal de Commerce de Nice

27/01/2026

Voir →

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141890

Admin. suprême

20 février 2014

20 février 2014

On 12 March 2012 the trial court acquitted the accused because the proceedings had not been initiated by the correct prosecutor in respect of the charges of bodily injury, and because there was insufficient

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021DEC005312207

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2008

21 octobre 2008

A hearing scheduled for 14   October 2002 was adjourned because, again, the parties had agreed to settle the case but had failed to do so.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169253

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2016

6 novembre 2016

The applicant argued that he wanted to live in Austria with his wife and child; that his wife needed his support due to her pregnancy; and that he could not return to the Netherlands because he would be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203418

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2020

4 juin 2020

According to the applicant, because of inadequate treatment, he suffered from more frequent epilepsy seizures.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0412DEC003981098

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2001

12 avril 2001

The applicant further submits that because of the excessive length   of   his   detention, it could not be considered as a provisional measure, but constituted an anticipatory sentence,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007554501

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

23 octobre 2003

The Government firstly maintained that the applicant had failed to exhaust domestic remedies because he had not submitted a constitutional claim challenging the legislation in question.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC001789108

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2017

17 octobre 2017

The sale of the land on 20   January 2005 was also illegal because, according to the law, only land which had previously been leased could be sold and only by a tender.

Source officielle
CA

Avis

CADA:20160596

Appel

3 mars 2016

3 mars 2016

Monsieur X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 8 février 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le président du Groupe BERRI à sa demande

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002426494

Admin. suprême

22 février 1995

22 février 1995

The trial judge also emphasised the position of the applicant's two co-accused in that considerable delay had already been experienced by them because of the applicant's behaviour to date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161567

Admin. suprême

24 février 2016

24 février 2016

Nobody is able to work because he is bribing them [AMD] 5,000. Hunger is a bad thing and poverty is the worst thing in the world.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0405JUD002179112

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2018

5 avril 2018

In addition, on ten occasions the hearings were adjourned because of applications by the prosecutor or on the court’s own motion, and on nine occasions because the applicant’s applications were granted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC000931924

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2024

21 novembre 2024

24 18/03/2024 (59 applicants) Frigyes Józsefné KERTI 1956 Lászlóné BALLAGÓ 1942 Nóra BERENDI 1952 Árpád BLUHON 1981 Krisztina BLUHON 1973 Klára BOCSÁK 1984 Gyula Lászlóné BODA 1946 Ildikó BODA 1967 Beatrix

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0529DEC000587472

Admin. suprême

29 mai 1974

29 mai 1974

  The investigation of the offenses was difficult because they were cleverly planned and executed and because so many group members took part in them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0326JUD005699816

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2019

26 mars 2019

the hearing did not take place because the applicant refused to attend because of the conditions of detention in custody.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC000449304

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2006

18 mai 2006

The applicant refused treatment by prison doctors because he mistrusted them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1028DEC005566900

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2004

28 octobre 2004

On 20 March and 27 April 2000 a deputy Prosecutor General refused to authorise an extension of the investigation period because “there were no lawful grounds for an extension” and because “the applicant's

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1841383-1932283

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2006

14 novembre 2006

The applicant was unable to appeal because legal aid was refused. She was subsequently advised that her appeal had no prospects of success.   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0506DEC001161885

Admin. suprême

6 mai 1986

6 mai 1986

In addition the applicant alleges that the Netherlands authorities violated Article 12 (Art. 12) of the Convention because they refused to give him an independent residence permit after his divorce.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523DEC004042217

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2023

23 mai 2023

The land was thereby transferred into State ownership and became a property in the public domain. 7 .

Source officielle