CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

4 294 résultats pour « Atiback »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9369

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2014

17 avril 2014

Viewed in the light of the context in which the impugned statement was made, and the style used in the article, the Court considered that it had not amounted to a gratuitous personal attack.

Source officielle

Page 43 sur 215

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2161

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

The criticism it contained of the local authorities’ and mayor’s performance had a solid factual basis, did not amount to a personal attack and was not insulting or frivolous.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11049

Admin. suprême

23 février 2016

23 février 2016

Law – Article 2: Domestic violence is a phenomenon which may take a variety of forms – including physical attacks, psychological violence and insults – and which is not confined to the present case.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68068-68536

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 1999

7 octobre 1999

    Later, the applicant sued the State Treasury for damages “for an unlawful attack by State officials and theft of personal possessions”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11156

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2016

5 juillet 2016

  1, the Court had accepted the claim of ownership by some applicants on the basis of extracts from a housing inventory issued by the town administration after the attack complained of.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3193

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2006

4 juillet 2006

Absence of a remedy in domestic law permitting a detainee to contest his placement in solitary confinement: violation   Facts : The applicant, who had been implicated in a number of terrorist attacks

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244412

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2025

1 juillet 2025

It concluded that those shortcomings left key questions unanswered, including whether the dogs purportedly seen by the witnesses were those responsible for the attack and whether they belonged to the defendants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244114

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2025

10 juin 2025

The applicant alleges under Article 3 of the Convention that: (i) the police failed to protect her from G.P.’s verbal and physical attack, and (ii) the relevant authorities failed to conduct an effective

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10989

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2016

12 avril 2016

Despite this, the domestic authorities completely disregarded the racist motives behind the attack.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12012

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2018

17 juillet 2018

Following its publication, a Facebook page was created to protest about it and a third party (X) made the following statements on the page: “This is also not an attack on a man for saying something wrong

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160666

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2016

14 janvier 2016

However, the exit of the parking lot was blocked by another car and some of the attackers started to fire at the applicant’s husband from firearms.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1710

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

Law : Article 3 – There was no evidence in the contemporaneous medical reports to support the applicant's allegations that he had been subjected to a brutal attack by the arresting officers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0214DEC001769518

Admin. suprême

14 février 2023

14 février 2023

He submitted that he had been apprehended by the Hungarian authorities on the same day, subjected to dog attacks and beatings inflicted by or in the presence of Hungarian officers, and removed to the external

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244140

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2025

5 juin 2025

The applicant’s lawyer was able to get footage from surveillance cameras showing the moment of the attack.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249999

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

In application no. 24890/23 the applicant’s son, A.H., died of a heart attack on 15 November 2012 when making payments in a bank.

Source officielle
TJ

JLD

686c264edd7001754d620820

T. Judiciaire

6 juillet 2025

6 juillet 2025

Il y a également la menace à l’ordre menace, aticke L 723-4 du CESEDA. Me Cécile [K] est entendue en ses observations : Il y aurait eu une attestation d’hébergement mais il n’y a pas de passeport.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9038

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2013

24 septembre 2013

In the instant case, the graphic manner of presentation had served to reinforce in readers’ minds the arguments set out in the article, including those which could be seen as an attack on the prosecutors

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410DEC002824806

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

    On 5 March 2004 the applicant brought a civil action for compensation against Y.C. before the Şişli Civil Court of First Instance on the ground that some of his remarks constituted an attack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209807

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2021

8 avril 2021

He further alleges that the publications in question breached his right to respect for his private life under Article 8 of the Convention in that they amounted to an unlawful and unjustified attack on

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234746

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2024

7 juin 2024

The court gave decisive weight to the evidence supporting T.’s version of events and found that it had not been proven that he had behaved in the manner described in the indictment; in its view, the attacks

Source officielle