Section 333(1) “A judgment which can no longer be contested by an appeal shall become final where it decides on the plaintiff’s claim or on a counter-claim.”

indiqué à l'issue des débats **** APPELANTE : SA CARMA représentée par ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 7] [Localité 8] Représentée par Me Alexandre

la personne de son représentant légal en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège représentée par la SELARL BOULAN-CHERFILS-IMPERATORE, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, assistée de Me Alexandre

09 Mladen KUNŠTEK against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 1 April 2014 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre

l'Etat de Californie GOOGLE INC prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux, ayant son siège social [Adresse 1]), représentée par la SCP FANET SERRA, avoués à la Cour, assistée de Maître Alexandra

understand or speak the language used in court”, and it is difficult to see how one can exercise these rights without being present (see Colozza v.

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 5   January 2016 as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Kristina Pardalos,   Linos-Alexandre

It does not impose sanctions and cannot annul illegal acts of the administration (see Kaja v.   Greece , no. 32927/03, § 34, 27 July 2006). 37.

“Special equipment” is defined as truncheons, arm-restraining instruments, tear gas, rubber bullets, water cannons and other means (Articles 1).

The Court thus cannot follow the Government’s line of reasoning. 69.

Finally, the applicant referred to his being ill with thyroid cancer. The applicant’s counsel added that the illness rendered him unfit for prolonged detention. 22.

Westerdiek , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 10 October 2002, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Mr Paul Evald Putter, Mr Victor Alexandrov

What is decisive is whether this fear can be regarded as objectively justified (ibid., para. 48). 28.

The same time-limit cannot be reset more than once.”

cannot be taken into account at the merits stage (see Demades v.

According to the domestic law, such questioning cannot be used as evidence in criminal proceedings, but the Government relied on it in their observations. 33.

    The Court must reiterate, however, that the applicants cannot derive any right to double compensation or unjust enrichment from the Court’s judgment.

It is also clear that such scarcity of space cannot be seen as short, occasional and minor within the meaning of the Court’s case-law (see Muršić v. Croatia [GC], cited above, § 130). 57.

“Possessions” can be “existing possessions” or assets, including, in certain well-defined situations, claims.