In the latter regard, the applicant refers to an incident which allegedly took place in September 2009 and concerned a letter sent to the applicant by the Court.

    On 27 December 2016 the applicant’s representative’s law firm sent a letter to the Court requesting an extension of the time-limit for submission of observations for two months because a

As no reply was received by the applicant, by a letter dated 19 February 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant and his representative Ž.

Notice of the communication was sent to the applicant who was also requested to appoint a representative pursuant to Rule 36 §§ 2 and 4 of the Rules of Court.

The letter, which had been sent to the applicants’ representative in Germany, returned as unclaimed.

By letter dated 20 March 2024, sent through eComms, the Registry informed Mr Pomazuyev that the Government had not submitted their observations within the given time-limit.

That letter was re-sent to the applicant, by registered mail with acknowledgment of receipt, on 23 January 2008, after it was established that due to a clerical error the previous letter had been sent

Mme E B est propriétaire depuis 2007 d'une maison d'habitation située sur la parcelle cadastrée n° A 159 à Raffetot dont l'accès se fait, soit par la rue de la Plaine du Château, soit par la sente rurale

A similar letter was sent to the applicant’s address in Świerklaniec on 14   January 2011.

Sodba Sodišča (veliki senat) z dne 20. aprila 2010.#Federutility in drugi proti Autorità per l'energia elettrica e il gas.

Sklep Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 30. januarja 2014.#France Telecom España SA proti Organismo de Gestión Tributaria de la Diputación de Barcelona.

Sodba Sodišča (četrti senat) z dne 26. februarja 2015.#Christie’s France SNC proti Syndicat national des antiquaires.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Cour de cassation.

Sodba Sodišča (deseti senat) z dne 4. marca 2015.#SIA „Oliver Medical“ proti Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Administratīvā rajona tiesa.

Sodba Sodišča (peti senat) z dne 16. aprila 2015.#Karoline Gruber proti Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat für Kärnten in drugim.

Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 28. marca 2019.#Tallinna Vesi proti Keskkonnaamet.#Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Tallinna Ringkonnakohus.

Sodba Sodišča (prvi senat) z dne 18. marca 2021.#MK proti Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.

Sodba Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 11. januarja 2024.#Amer Foz proti Svetu Evropske unije.

Sodba Sodišča (tretji senat) z dne 3. marca 2005.#Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn proti Skatteministeriet in Skatteministeriet proti Fonden Marselisborg Lystbådehavn.