the Convention or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having

    Application of Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of the Court Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court provides: “When an application has been struck out, the costs shall be at the discretion of the Court

39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having

the Convention or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

On 23 September 2013, the applicant filed a request for an interim measure within the meaning of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court to the effect that the Netherlands authorities would stay his removal.

of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated

1999   (“the Tribunal Rules”) came into force.

On 19 October 2009 the Court decided to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and to stay the applicant’s deportation to Burundi for the duration of the proceedings before it.

In absence of Convention provision a Rule 36 indication cannot give rise to a binding obligation. This is reflected in the wording of both Rule 36 and the indications in the present case.

He accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

    The Court need not examine whether the Constitutional Court ought to have dispensed with the formal requirement under Rule 21 of its Rules (see paragraph 2 above) in view of the applicant

He accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

France [GC] - 67335/01 Judgment 29.3.2006 [GC] Article 7 Article 7-1 Nullum crimen sine lege Sentence subject to rules on recidivism as a result of the application of a new law: no violation   Facts

The President of the Section to which the case had been allocated granted the applicant’s request for his identity not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4 of the Rules of Court).

The President decided that the applicant’s identity should not to be disclosed to the public (Rule 47 § 4). She is represented before the Court by Ms K.A.

On 25 August 2005 the applicants requested the Court to indicate to the Swedish Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, the suspension of their deportation to Azerbaijan.

This rule, as stipulated in the Convention and in the Rules of Court, is to be interpreted in the light of the general objective of facilitating friendly settlement and protecting the parties and the Court

or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court).

The Court further notes that in accordance with Rule 36 §§ 2 and 4 of the Rules of Court the applicant should be represented before the Court following notification of the application to the Government