Nicolas Agnoux, maître des requêtes, - les conclusions de Mme Emilie Bokdam-Tognetti, rapporteur public ; La parole ayant été donnée, avant et après les conclusions, au Cabinet Briard, avocat de la société

LYON 6ème Chambre ARRET du 23 MAI 2001 Décision déférée : JUGEMENT du TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE de LYON en date du 13 Décembre 1999 (RG : 199990012) N° RG Cour : 2000/00580 Nature du recours : DECL

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and in its judgment in the case of Krasuski v.

Poland , no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V, and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII, and in its the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland , no.

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland , no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

Poland (dec.) no. 11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v. Poland (dec.) no. 28953/03).

  Serbia (dec.), no. 30859/10, § 29, 14 January 2014). 7.

The report stated inter alia that legislative decree No. 225/1973 was repealed by legislative decree No. 72/1974 and that the property thereby “reverted to its former ownership status”.

plaidoiries,*] Mireille QUENTIN DE GROMARD, vice-présidente placée, désignée par ordonnance du premier président en date du 10 juillet 2006, assistés lors des débats tenus en audience publique par Nicole

France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 15, ECHR 2002-VIII). 39.

Romania ((dec.), no. 122/17, 15 November 2022), either directly in its observations or by a subsequent letter and invited the Court to declare the cases inadmissible.

Moldova (dec.), no. 19274/03, 21 November 2006; Cumatrenco v.   Moldova (dec.), no. 28209/03, 20 March 2007; Guranda v.   Moldova (dec.), no. 28412/03, 20 March 2007; and Volghin v.

  Poland (dec.), cited above).

, and of Article 676 of the same legislative decree.

Turkey (dec.), no. 46947/99, 24 February 2005 and Güzel v. Turkey (dec.), no. 65849/01, 18 October 2005).

  San Marino (Dec.) no. 34657/97, 28 May 2002, Priebke v. Italy (Dec.), no. 48799/99, 5   April 2001, and De Lorenzo v. Italy (Dec.), no. 69264/01, 12 February 2004) or to experts.

; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 27126/11 Nicolaas

Poland (dec.), no. 52039/99, 16 October 2001 and, more recently, Międzyzakładowa Spółdzielnia Mieszkaniowa Warszawscy Budowlani v. Poland (dec.), no. 13990/04, 26 October 2004).

  15212/03 (dec.), §§   12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v.   Poland no.   11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v.