CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD006402009
18 décembre 2018
He also contended that he had merely been a drug user and not a drug dealer. 28 .
Page 42 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD004650508
15 janvier 2015
However the court did not address that issue in its decision. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD000542204
9 décembre 2008
Merits 1. Period to be taken into consideration 32.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2528592-2754314
4 novembre 2008
M.H. was residing abroad but the authorities failed to make every reasonable effort to determine her actual address in order to obtain her attendance at the trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD006621512
10 juillet 2018
The Presidium merely noted the absence of the need for the two test purchases on 17 May and 19 June 2013, as the episode on 10 May 2013 had already been properly recorded.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023DEC006279310
23 octobre 2012
It is merely assessing whether its decision contains an important point of law.” 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0623JUD003843505
23 juin 2009
It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD000533411
1 juin 2017
The Government did not comment on the admissibility and merits of the application. 20.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002624995
23 octobre 1997
It merely considers whether the foreign court had jurisdiction according to the English and Jersey rules of the conflict of laws.
4ème CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE
66308969031696000841341f
29 avril 2024
LOA [Localité 3] prise en la personne de son Gérant domicilié en cette qualité au siège social [Adresse 2] Représentée par Maître Quentin DUPOUY, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX INTIMÉE : S.A.S
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0512DEC000230910
12 mai 2020
Section 53(3a) allows the police authorities to request the providers to disclose the name, address and number of a specific telephone line, to disclose the IP-address relating to a specific
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR00424
28 mars 2018
mail de l'intéressé connue d'elle datant du mois d'octobre 2013, ils ont en vain tenté de le contacter en lui adressant un message à cette adresse ; qu'ils ne se sont pas contentés de cela puisqu'à la
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC003681197
4 mai 2000
On 25 July 1996 an attempt was made to serve notice of the date of the hearing on the applicant company at the chosen address of its lawyer.
Pôle 5 - Chambre 4
6034458b47adcf3654b7133b
11 janvier 2017
Novembre 2012 -Tribunal de Commerce de CRETEIL - RG n° 2010F00516 APPELANTES SAS TREMCO ILLBRUCK PRODUCTION Immatriculé au RCS de Strasbourg sous le numéro 692 034 945 ayant son siège social [Adresse
Chambre des référés
6a0f86cecdc6046d477febaf
19 mai 2026
Sébastien MORGAN, président du tribunal judiciaire de CHALONS EN CHAMPAGNE, assisté de Dominique GRANDREMY, cadre-greffier, avons rendu la décision dont la teneur suit : ENTRE : Monsieur [S] [Y] [Adresse
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210JUD002650406
10 février 2015
C.R.’s address was incorrect and no one with the witness’s first name lived at the available address. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622JUD001079412
22 juin 2023
However, as far as the addressee of the measure is concerned, the Court of Cassation has clarified that the caution does not impose new legal obligations, as it merely reminds him or her
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110JUD002225107
10 janvier 2012
The examination of the merits of such an application would include an assessment of compliance with Article 8 of the Convention. A. Relevant domestic law 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113JUD001430717
13 janvier 2026
The applicant was searched without a prior judicial warrant, and the investigating authorities failed to justify this by explaining the circumstances which made it necessary, merely citing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0105DEC005233512
5 janvier 2016
The object of the rule is to allow the national authorities to address the allegation of a violation of a Convention right and, where appropriate, to afford redress before that allegation