Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

Jebens ,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges , and Mr S.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Nedayborshch v.

  66746/01, §§ 81–84, 27   May 2004) which concerned summary possession proceedings. The relevant passage reads as follows: “81.

All applicants are represented before the Court by Mr   Mats   Welin, a lawyer practising in Helsinki. A.

  The first applicant was arrested on 10 May 1984 and detained on remand.

  Finland (dec.), no. 56463/10, 3 May 2011, with further references). 28.

matter jurisdiction rules. 39.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Yershova v.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ibragimov and Others v.

  STRASBOURG 31 March 2026   This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

On 24 March 2003 (in the submitted documents the date is also stated as 25 March 2003) the Urus-Martan prosecutor's office suspended the investigation in criminal case no.

Sweden (no. 1) , judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, pp. 31-32, § 67).

may be subject to editorial revision.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

redress for such breach, such as reducing the sentence in an express and measurable manner (see Jensen v.

    The hearings on the merits of the case commenced on 21 May and lasted until 26 May 2004. 40 .

Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mercieca and Others v.