reasons against holding a hearing.”

Estonia - 64160/11 Judgment 8.11.2016 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Public hearing Oral hearing Lack of substantive reasons for small-claims court’s refusal to hold oral hearing:

    A procedural hearing was fixed for 22 July 2008 to determine whether the parties were ready to proceed to a full hearing.

Cette demande est dépourvue de tout fondement, la SAS GN HEARING en sera déboutée.

During the hearing the applicant requested to be released.

On 14 March 2013 a hearing was held in administrative case No.   3 ‑ 12 ‑ 1219. No representative from Viru Prison was present at the hearing although they had been summoned.

was significant ( znaczny ) and that she needed a hearing aid.

The hearing was adjourned at the request of Unirol Ltd. On 17   March   1995 the trial court held a hearing. The plaintiff was absent at that hearing.

  The Court found that in any event defects of the right to a fair hearing in the first instance proceedings could be healed in the course of the appeal hearing if the appeal court enjoyed full jurisdiction

Further hearings were held on 6 January, 14 April and 18 September 1997. According to the applicant, the hearing of 18 September 1997 was in fact an in camera sitting.

At the hearing of 21   May 2008 the applicant was represented by a State-appointed advocate I.K. the hearing was adjourned because the applicant was brought to a hospital At the hearing of 12  

Counsel had not been summoned to the hearing and learnt of the date of the hearing only one day before.

He complained, among other things, about the amount of the court costs that he had to pay at the end of those proceedings and relied on Article   6 §   1 (right to a fair hearing).

At the hearing of 16 November 1999, the applicant complained that he had been ill-treated in police custody.

The court adjourned the hearing. 43.

A hearing need not be held if the parties expressly waive their right to a hearing. The parties may express such a waiver up to the beginning of the hearing. ...”

#xa0;     Application No. 12129/86                       by Hans-Dieter HENNINGS

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing on the issue of delay in the second hearing in February 1993.