CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

24 730 résultats pour « Farissy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD005193010

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2013

17 décembre 2013

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);No violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (Article 13 - Effective remedy)

Page 42 sur 1237

← PrécédentSuivant →
Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12163

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2018

30 octobre 2018

Law – Article 8: The impugned measures had been adopted in accordance with the national Family Act and had pursued the legitimate aim of protecting rights and freedoms of the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14556

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2025

16 décembre 2025

Finland - 42758/23 Judgment 16.12.2025 [Section II] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Domestic courts’ order for return of two children from Finland to Russia under the Hague Convention following

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD001766517

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2021

15 juin 2021

The second applicant’s name featured in the “family members” column. 15.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10135

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

Ukraine - 28403/05 Judgment 23.10.2014 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Refusal to transfer prisoner to a prison nearer home so that he could receive visits from his elderly mother

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1023JUD002840305

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

family life, as the opportunity for family members to visit the prisoner is vital to maintaining family life (see Ospina Vargas v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14535

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2025

6 novembre 2025

Furthermore, in taking its decision, it had had regard to the entire family situation and had relied on an expert report by a psychologist.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0721JUD000906314

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2016

21 juillet 2016

Preliminary objection dismissed;No violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for family life);Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224971

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2023

4 mai 2023

Family members: wife and son.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD000226010

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

the visas that would enable the family to be reunited.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0322JUD002333809

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2012

22 mars 2012

was allowed to grow up undisturbed within her family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7537

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2013

16 mai 2013

Ukraine - 20390/07 Judgment 16.5.2013 [Section V] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Refusal to allow a change of patronymic: violation   Facts

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529JUD006440609

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2018

29 mai 2018

They stated that they wanted to bury their children side by side in their family cemetery in Siirt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0920JUD003049117

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2018

20 septembre 2018

Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10929

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

The father left the family home and the applicant was admitted to hospital as her health worsened.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013JUD005255714

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

life with their own family. 44.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10329

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

  Austria )* removed their daughter from Italy, where the family lived, to Austria in February 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD000622114

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

On 19 October 2012 she left the family home and took the child with her. They moved in with her parents and grandmother. 7 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD003786202

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

However, it is an essential part of a prisoner’s right to respect for family life that the authorities enable him or, if need be, assist him in maintaining contact with his close family   (see Messina

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0921JUD005366115

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2017

21 septembre 2017

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the Austrian authorities had failed to ensure his sons’ return to France, thus violating his right to respect for his family life. 4.

Source officielle