Sergey Aleksandrovich Lipetsk 15/11/2016 to 14/11/2017 Levoberezhniy District Court of Lipetsk, Lipetsk Regional Court 1   year(s)   failure to conduct the proceedings with due diligence during

However, the case-law of the ECHR does not allow for the conclusion that a suspect is entitled to have a lawyer present during police interviews.

    The applicant alleged that he had been ill-treated during his arrest.

karakter van product van oorsprong verkrijgt - Blokken silicium uit China - Scheiden, kleinmaken en reinigen van blokken alsmede zeven, sorteren van korrels op grootte en verpakken ervan in India - Dumping

#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common commercial policy – Anti-dumping duties – Regulation (EC) No 384/96 – Article 3(9) – Threat of material injury – Factors – Article 9(4) – Regulation (EC) No

#Recurso de anulação — Dumping — Extensão do direito antidumping definitivo sobre as importações de determinado tipo de calçado com a parte superior de couro natural originário do Vietname e da República

#Dumping - Schoeisel van textiel, van oorsprong uit Volksrepubliek China en Indonesië - Verordening van Commissie tot instelling van voorlopig antidumpingrecht - Beroep tot nietigverklaring - Latere vaststelling

The applicant was allegedly beaten severely on his neck and back during his arrest.

The applicant submits that some of his statements during the trial were incorrectly recorded in the court documents.

He alleged that during the District Court hearings he had been denied a fair trial in that he had not been assisted by a lawyer during the first two months of the trial.

He further complained that he had been subjected to ill-treatment by the police during the criminal investigation opened against him, and that the medical treatment during his pre-trial detention had been

Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning detention in a metal cage during court hearings; Yaroslav Belousov v.

He added that he had not been subjected to ill-treatment during his arrest and while at the Anti-Terrorist Branch. 21.

On the same date he complained of chest pain and stated that he had been beaten by policemen during his arrest. 11 .

    The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.

During the visits, the doctor would monitor vital signs, check motor function, and ask questions concerning possible side effects.

., J.S. and S.T.), children present during the arrest (A.N., D.K., D.B. and E.G.), two police officers present at the police department during the applicant's detention (K.I. and P.S.), witnesses M.Z.,

No lawyer was present during the questioning. On the same day criminal proceedings regarding the robbery were resumed.

The judgment was exclusively based on the presence of hashish found during the house search of 8 December 2004.