Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242937
31 mars 2025
31 mars 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression by the imposition of the fine on her for contempt of court, contrary to Article 10 of
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6743
21 mars 2000
21 mars 2000
In October 1998 the Constitutional Court found that the relevant provision was unconstitutional and contrary to Article 6 of the Convention in so far as it excluded court review, as a result of which the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-194741
24 juin 2019
24 juin 2019
; Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his placement under full guardianship, on account of his disability and social status, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172646
8 mars 2017
8 mars 2017
The applicant complains that his placement in immigration detention between 23 September 2016 and 19 November 2016 was contrary to Article 5 § 1 (f) of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218098
1 juin 2022
1 juin 2022
The law that stipulated that offence was later repealed as being contrary to the Constitution and to the Convention and the applicant was reinstated.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242513
24 février 2025
24 février 2025
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant been tried twice for the same offence contrary to Article 4 § 1 of Protocol No. 7 to the Convention ( see Mihalache v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238542
14 novembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his private and family life and his home, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198335
8 octobre 2019
8 octobre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237740
27 septembre 2024
27 septembre 2024
The applicant complains that if he were to be deported to Syria he would be exposed to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention, inter alia , because he is wanted by the Syrian authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229304
6 novembre 2023
6 novembre 2023
Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229708
27 novembre 2023
27 novembre 2023
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the grounds of his sex, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-217171
6 avril 2022
6 avril 2022
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of peaceful assembly, contrary to Article 11 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 14
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225272
15 mai 2023
15 mai 2023
The applicant complains that she received the summons to the hearing only on 17 April 2013, and that consequently she was denied a fair trial contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198329
9 octobre 2019
9 octobre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private life and correspondence, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216450
23 février 2022
23 février 2022
QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, and in particular of his right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197174
2 octobre 2019
2 octobre 2019
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the proceeding for the return of his child giving
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249981
2 avril 2026
2 avril 2026
Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of his national origin, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231654
22 février 2024
22 février 2024
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201304
24 janvier 2020
24 janvier 2020
Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Articles 10 and/or 11 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242180
3 février 2025
3 février 2025
Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article 10 of the Convention by the fine imposed on the applicant (see Karácsony and Others
Source officiellePage 42 sur 1005