CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0704DEC001205686
4 juillet 1988
(The child) was then tense and nervous and had 'ticks'. The second occasion was 15 May this year. (The child) had appeared freer and seemed well.
Page 42 sur 385
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116008
17 décembre 2012
decide to separate the child from the parents (the father or the mother)... 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1012DEC001653490
12 octobre 1992
After having obtained the opinion of the child welfare committee and subsequently, in accordance with the applicant's request, the opinion of the Child Welfare Council of Iceland, the Ministry of Justice
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202JUD001862003
2 décembre 2008
The wording “apparent need of child welfare measures” referred to section 12, which set a clearly lower threshold for child welfare measures than the threshold set in section 16 for taking a child into
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD004949206
6 novembre 2008
of the child; c) the grounds on which the applicant's claim for return of the child is based; d) all available information relating to the whereabouts of the child and the identity of the person with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0224JUD001642490
24 février 1995
with the child and his parent or by a decision of the Sheriff Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313JUD002626605
13 mars 2012
of forty-eight months, starting with the birth of each child, if the period of child-raising was spent in Austria.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD007087911
30 juin 2020
maintenance; refuses to collect the child from the maternity hospital or from any other medical, educational, social or similar institution; abuses his or her parental authority; mistreats the child by
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD003651597
26 février 2002
Mr Fretté's application to adopt a child is motivated by a desire to provide a child with affection and a proper upbringing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624JUD006134721
24 juin 2025
Centre once, asking that the child be returned to her because she had ensured “physical conditions for the child” as regards the house.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708JUD003187196
8 juillet 2003
The Convention on the Rights of the Child 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518JUD005533900
18 mai 2006
B.F. left the child with the applicant and disappeared for over a month.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0531JUD003534806
31 mai 2011
But the need to free the child for adoption is different from the need for the child to be adopted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD001211914
13 février 2025
She did not see the child over Christmas.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2721823-2977917
7 mai 2009
In September 2003 she gave birth to a child out of wedlock.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2347
4 décembre 2007
The applicants requested artificial insemination facilities to enable them to have a child together, arguing that it would not otherwise be possible, given the husband’s earliest release date (2009) and
ECLI:CEDH:001-111771
30 mai 2012
According to the request, the conditions at home endangered the welfare of the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-159742
10 décembre 2015
The judgment to return the child has remained unenforced. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410DEC005324109
10 avril 2012
At that time the child was cared for by the paternal grandparents.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD004514214
12 juillet 2016
A parent residing separately from a child is entitled to maintain contact with the child and to participate in his upbringing and education.